Civil Miscellaneous Petition seeking to implead a proposed party as 11th respondent in W.A.No.435 of 2014. The Court allowed the impleadment and directed listing.
Impleadment of the proposed party as 11th respondent allowed; case listed after two weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.M.P.No.19934 of 2023 in W.A.No.435 of 2014
D.KRISHNAKUMAR, J. AND P.B.BALAJI, J.
(Order of the Court was made by D.Krishnakumar, J.)
Heard the respective learned counsels appearing for the parties.
[D.K.K., J.] [P.B.B., J.] 14.09.2023
ss
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to allow impleadment of a proposed party as 11th respondent in a civil appeal.
Unknown Petitioner
Proposed Party
D.Krishnakumar
P.B.Balaji
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
