Petitioner filed a contempt petition for disobeying a previous court order regarding encroachment. Court closed the petition upon representation that encroachment was removed.
Contempt petition closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Cont P No.1803 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 13.09.2023
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.KRISHNAKUMAR
AND
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.B. BALAJI
Contempt Petition No.1803 of 2023
B.Murugadoss
... Petitioner
versus
1.Siva Kalaiselvan
Block Development Officer, Thirukazhukundram Taluk, Chengalpat District -603109.
2.G.Perumal, President, Keerapakkam Village, Deshmukipettai post, Thirukazhukundram Taluk, Chengalpat District-630109.
Respondents
PRAYER: Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Court Act, to punish the respondents for willfully disobeying the order dated 14.11.2022 passed in W.P.No.30049 of 2022.
For the Petitioner : Mr.A.Kumar For the Respondents : Mrs.Geetha Thamaraiselvan Special Government Pleader
1/3
Cont P No.1803 of 2023
ORDER
(Order of the Court was made by D.KRISHNAKUMAR, J. )
Contempt Petition is filed to punish the respondents for willfully disobeying the order dated 14.11.2022 passed in W.P.No.30049 of 2022
[D.K.K., J.] [P.B.B., J.] 13.09.2023
Index : Yes/No Neutral Citation : Yes/No mrn
2/3
Cont P No.1803 of 2023
D.KRISHNAKUMAR, J. and P.B. BALAJI
(mrn)
Contempt Petition No.1803 of 2023
13.09.2023
3/3
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the contempt petition should be closed in view of the removal of encroachment.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
B.Murugadoss
Siva Kalaiselvan
G.Perumal
D.Krishnakumar
P.B.Balaji
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
