R.Rajendran v. Rani
Case brief
What is this about?
The appellate court dismissed an appeal filed under Section 96 of the CPC as the appellants were absent in court without representation despite prior listings under the caption 'For Dismissal'.
What did the court decide?
Appeal suit dismissed for default/non-prosecution. Connected miscellaneous petition closed.
What the court decided
AS.No.758/2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 12.01.2023
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.S.SUNDAR
AND
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.A.NAKKIRAN
AS.No.758/2014 & MP.No.1/2014
1.R.Rajendran 2.R.Damodaran .. Appellants Vs.
1.Rani 2.R.Velu .. Respondents
Prayer:- Appeal Suit filed under Section 96 of the Civil Procedure Code against the judgment and decree dated 31.07.2014 passed in OS.No.163/2012 on the file of the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge, Cuddalore.
1
Parties & counsel
- appellant
1.R.Rajendran
- appellant
2.R.Damodaran
- respondent
1.Rani
- respondent
2.R.Velu
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court