c) From the pleadings and evidence, it is seen that the agreement in favour of the Appellant was executed by A.Govindasamy @ Rangasamy and other legal heirs of two brothers, namely, Natesan Gramani and Rathinavel Gramani. It is admitted that the 1st Respondent herein is not a party to the sale agreement even though the agreement was executed in respect of the whole property. It is also to be noted that the sale agreement was executed as if the vendors, who are parties to the agreement, are the only legal heirs of Appavoo Gramani. Based on the agreement, the Appellant filed a suit in OS.No.241 of 1995, before the Principal Sub Court, Pudhucherry, against the other legal heirs of Appavoo Gramani, who are parties to the agreement. The suit is for specific performance of the agreement of sale. The suit was decreed by a judgement and decree dated 11.04.2001 in favour of the Appellant. A sale deed, dated 19.04.2005 was also obtained from the Principal Sub Court, Pudhucherry in execution of the decree for specific performance. Therefore, it is stated by the Appellant that he became the exclusive owner of the property, which is acquired by the Government of Pudhucherry. In the course of evidence, the Appellant has produced patta in respect of the suit property in the name of the Appellant.
