B.Kishore v. J.Neetha
Case brief
What is this about?
This appeal filed under Section 96 of CPC was heard on 10.01.2023. The appellant sought adjournment despite the matter being listed for dismissal. The court dismissed the appeal for non-prosecution.
What did the court decide?
Appeal suit dismissed for non-prosecution; connected Miscellaneous Petition closed. No costs.
What the court decided
AS.No.379 of 2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 10.01.2023
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.S.SUNDAR
AND
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.A.NAKKIRAN
AS.No.379 of 2014 MP.No.1 of 2014
B.Kishore
Appellant
Vs
J.Neetha Respondents Prayer:- This Appeal Suit is filed, under Section 96 of CPC, against the judgement and decree, dated 07.02.2014, made in OS.No.12 of 2005 (PoP.No.2 of 2004), by the Family Court Judge, Salem.
For Appellant : Mr.R.Bhaskaran for Mr.T.S.rajamohan For Respondent : No Appearance
Parties & counsel
- appellant
B.Kishore
- respondent
J.Neetha
Coram
S.S.SUNDAR
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court