mentioned above. According to the claimant, the above contention is evidenced by the documents filed on the side of the claimant marked as Ex. C3 ledger extract and balance sheets produced as Ex C19 and Ex.C34 and also the photographs of the said building structures and elevation of the above said sales and service centres established produced as Ex.C5. The Learned Counsel for claimant also contended that the during the cross examination of RW1 under Q.Nos.103 to 108 he has not stated anything against the above investment made by the claimant in the said dealership business. According to the claimant, these investments and operational costs were met with personal money and bank loans and the total loan availed by the claimant is Rs 9.88 Crores from SBI that is now with interest Rs. 11,22 29,6902,39,00,000 from Axis bank and Rs.2,00,00,000 from Standard Chartered hank- Rs.15,61,29,690/- According to the claimant, due to the closure of business, the accounts have become non-performing and the various properties of the claimant have been attached and the total loss as per bank action is Rs.15,61,29,690/- The claimant has claimed this amount from the respondent on account of loss of investment and operational costs as evidenced in Ex C3 ledger. Whereas the Learned Counsel for respondent has contended that the claimant was benefited out of their investment by running the dealership for more than 16 years and the buildings and showrooms mentioned has to be treated as assets of the
