The court allowed the plaintiff's applications to reopen evidence, recalling a witness and admitting documents, citing the late procurement of a legal heirship certificate as sufficient cause, while allowing defendants to object on admissibility grounds.
The applications to recall PW1 and receive additional documents were allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
A.Nos.308 to 310 of 2023
A.Nos.308 to 310 of 2023 in C.S.No.530 of 2018
SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J.
These applications are presented by the plaintiff to reopen the
plaintiff's evidence, recall PW1 and receive the additional documents described in the Judge's summons.
07.02.2023
kal
(½)
1/2
A.Nos.308 to 310 of 2023
SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J.
kal
A.Nos.308 to 310 of 2023 in C.S.No.530 of 2018
07.02.2023 (½)
2/2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the plaintiff is entitled to permission to reopen evidence and recall witnesses after a fatal delay due to late obtaining of a legal heirship certificate.
Plaintiff
Defendants (including third defendant)
SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
