Single judge allowed applications to reopen evidence and permit examination of a witness via video conferencing due to unavailability of attesting witnesses in a case concerning letters of administration and a Will.
The applications were allowed; the matter was listed before Additional Master No.III for recording evidence with video conferencing facilities arranged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
A.Nos.616, 617 of 2023
A.Nos.616, 617 of 2023 in O.P.No.585 of 2020
SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J.
These two applications are presented by the petitioner seeking to re-
open the petitioner's evidence and permit the examination of the petitioner's witness, R.Kanniammal, through video conferencing.
that he has no objection to these applications being allowed.
1/2
A.Nos.616, 617 of 2023
rna
SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J.
06.02.2023
rna
A.Nos.616, 617 of 2023 in O.P.No.585 of 2020
2/2
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the court can be permitted to reopen evidence and examine a witness via video conferencing due to the unavailability of attesting witnesses.
Whether sufficient cause is shown to allow the examination of a witness through video conferencing in the present proceedings.
petitioner
respondent
SEnthilkumar RAMAMOorthy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
