A.Packir Mohideen, v. the Distridt Revenue Officer
Case brief
What is this about?
The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court dismissed the writ petition for lack of active prosecution by the petitioner's legal heirs and directed them to approach the competent civil forum for the grievance regarding patta issuance.
What did the court decide?
The writ petition stands closed with liberty to approach the competent civil forum.
What the court decided
W.P(MD)No.9137 of 2009
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 12.04.2022
CORAM :
THE HON`BLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI
W.P(MD)No.9137 of 2009 and M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2009
A.Packir Mohideen
: Petitioner
Vs.
1.The District Revenue Officer, Thanjavur District, Thanjavur.
- 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Pattukottai.
3.S.Abdul Khadar @ Pappa : Respondents
PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari calling for the records of the 1st respondent in proceedings in Tha.Pa.No.17/2003, in Na.Ka.No. 19306/2003/E(2), dated 19.05.2008 and quash the same.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the writ petition challenging patta issuance to a third party should be dismissed in favour of civil remedy.
Whether the petition stands closed due to lack of instructions from the legal heirs.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
A. Packir Mohideen
- respondent
District Revenue Officer, Thanjavur District
- respondent
Revenue Divisional Officer, Pattukottai
- respondent
S. Abdul Khadar @ Pappa
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court