In this writ petition filed under Article 226, the petitioner sought direction to return cheques and initiate action against police officials. The court dismissed the petition as infructuous based on the petitioner's counsel's endorsement that the relief has become unfruitful.
The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous with no costs awarded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P(MD)No.13044 of 2011
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 12.04.2022
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI W.P(MD)No.13044 of 2011 and M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2011
A.Shanmugavel
... Petitioner
versus
Chennai – 600 009.
... Respondents
(R6 is impleaded as per the order of this Court dated 18.11.2011 in M.P.(MD)No.2 of 2011)
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus, to direct the second respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 12.11.2011 and to return back the cheques to the petitioner after receiving the same from respondents 4 and 5 and also to initiate the suitable legal action against the erring police officials, namely, 4th and 5th respondents, in accordance with law.
For Petitioner : Mr.Babu Rajendran For R1 to R3 : Mr.G.Suriyananth Additional Government Pleader For R4 and R5 : No appearance For R6 : Tapal due
1/2
W.P(MD)No.13044 of 2011
ORDER
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the relief sought for in the writ petition has become infructuous. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.
/ /2022 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) To 1. The Secretary to Government, (Home Department), Secretariat, Chennai – 600 009. 2. The Inspector General of Police, (South Zone), Head Quarters at Madurai. 3. The Superintendent of Police, Virudhunagar District, Virudhunagar. 4. The Additional Public prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai +1 CC to M/s.SPL.GP. ( SR-18582[F] dated 13/04/2022 ) W.P(MD)No.13044 of 2011 12.04.2022 CK(CO) KB(02.05.2022) 2P 6C
2/2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition seeking writ of mandamus for return of cheques is maintainable when it has become infructuous.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
A.Shanmugavel
State of Tamil Nadu
Inspector General of Police
Superintendent of Police
L.Hyder Ali
Narayanasamy
B.Pugalendhi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
