Arul Mary v. the Secretary
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought writ to restrain telecasting of a programme. Respondents admitted programme ceased. Petitioner withdrew petition. Court dismissed it as withdrawn.
What the court decided
W.P(MD)No.15175 of 2011
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 11.04.2022
CORAM :
THE HON`BLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI
W.P(MD)No.15175 of 2011 and M.P(MD)Nos.1 & 2 of 2011
Arul Mary : Petitioner
Vs. 1.The Secretary, Ministry of Information and Broadcasting, “A” Wing, Shastri Bhavan, Dr.Rajendra Prasad Road, New Delhi – 110 001. 2.The Director General, Doordarshan, Doordarshan Bhavan, Copernicus Marg, New Delhi – 110 001. 3.The Chairman, The Secretary, Information and Public Relations, State Level Monitoring Committee, Chennai. 4.The Director, Doordarshan Kendra (State Capital Kendra), Chennai. 5.The Authorized Officer / District Magistrate / District Collector, Collectorate, Pudukottai, Pudukottai District. 6.The Superintendent of Police, Pudukottai, Pudukottai District. 7.The Managing Director, Zee Tamil Channel, Alpha Centre, ESSEL House 3rd Floor, No.150, 151, North Usman Road, Chennai – 600 017. : Respondents https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
1/3
W.P(MD)No.15175 of 2011
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Arul Mary
- respondent
Secretary, Ministry of Information and Broadcasting
- respondent
Director General, Doordarshan
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court