Petitioner challenged CBSE's decision to allot a different school for conducting AISSE exams. Court held the petition infructuous based on counsel's submission and dismissed it, closing connected petitions.
No relief granted; petition dismissed as infructuous; connected petitions closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.(MD) No.4650 of 2019
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 06.09.2022
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD
W.P.(MD) No.4650 of 2019 and W.M.P.(MD)Nos.3706 & 3707 of 2019
K.Ramasubramaniyan
... Petitioner
-vs-
1.The Controller of Examinations, Central Board of Secondary Education, No.2, Community Centre, Preet Vihar, Delhi – 110 092.
Sri Parasakthi Vidhyalaya CBSE,
Page 1 of 4
W.P.(MD) No.4650 of 2019
Courtallam,
Tirunelveli District – 627 802.
... Respondents
PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records of the impugned communication of the second respondent vide CBSE:RO(M):CEN-INT/2019 dated 19.01.2019 and quash the same as illegal, arbitrary, injustice and direct the respondents to fix and allot 3rd respondent school as a centre for conduction All India Secondary School Examination (AISSE) March 2019 for 114 students of 3rd respondent school instead of Centre No.4161 locate at 4th respondent school.
For Petitioner : Mr.S.Sivasubramanian For Respondents : Mr.G.Nagarajan for R1 & R2 Mr.S.Velrajan for R3 Mr.L.Subramanian for R4 Mr.S.P.Maharajan, Special Government Pleader for R5
_____________ Page 2 of 4_
W.P.(MD) No.4650 of 2019
O R D E R
[Order of the Court was made by R.MAHADEVAN, J.]
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that this
Writ Petition has become infructuous and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.
2 . Recording the said submission, this Writ Petition is dismissed as
infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
[R.M.D., J.] [J.S.N.P., J.]
06.09.2022
Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No
vsm
_____________ Page 3 of 4_
W.P.(MD) No.4650 of 2019
R.MAHADEVAN, J. and
J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD, J.
vsm
To
2.The Regional Officer, Regional Office, Central Board of Secondary Education, Chennai – 600 040.
3.The Joint Commissioner, The Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Department, Tirunelveli District.
W.P.(MD) No.4650 of 2019 and W.M.P.(MD)Nos.3706 & 3707 of 2019
06.09.2022
_____________ Page 4 of 4_
K.Ramasubramaniyan
Controller of Examinations, CBSE
Regional Officer, CBSE, Chennai
Principal, Sri Parasakthi Vidhyalaya CBSE
Principal / Secretary, Bharath Vidya Mandir
The Joint Commissioner, The Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Department
R.Mahadevan
J.Sathy Narayana Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
