Disposed

M.Antony v. the District Collector

Madras HC5 Sept 2022WP(MD)/2876/2012

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This writ petition under Article 226 prayed for a direction to remove encroachment on communal land. The court disposed of the petition, directing authorities to consider earlier representations and remove encroachment within eight weeks.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondents to consider representations dated 30.10.2011 and 10.11.2011 and remove encroachment within eight weeks.

M.Antony Vs the District Collector — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2022)

¶1

W.P.(MD)No.2876 of 2012

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 05.09.2022

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD

¶6

W.P(MD)No.2876 of 2012

M.Antony

... Petitioner

Vs.

1.The District Collector, Thanjavur, Collectorate, Kachary Road, Thanjavur.

¶11

2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Revenue Divisional Office, Pattukottai.

¶12

3.The Tahsildar, Mathupatti Road, Pattukottai.

¶13

... Respondents

¶14

Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents to consider the representation dated 10.11.2011 to take action for removal of encroachment by restoring the said land for communal use in survey No.127/1 in Kollukadu Village, Pattukottai Taluk, Thanjavur District.

¶15

For Petitioner : No representation

¶16

1/5

¶17

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶18

For Respondents

¶19

W.P.(MD)No.2876 of 2012

¶20

: Mr.P.Thilak Kumar Government Pleader * * *

¶21

O R D E R

¶22

(Order of the Court was made by R.MAHADEVAN, J. )

¶23

The petitioner has come forward with this writ petition praying to issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 10.11.2011 and to take action for removal of encroachment by restoring the said land for communal use in survey No.127/1 in Kollukadu Village, Pattukottai Taluk, Thanjavur District.

¶24

There is no representation for the petitioner. Heard Mr.P.Thilak Kumar, learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondents.

¶25

The writ petitioner claims that some encroachment

¶26

has taken place in the year 2011 in survey no.127/1 in Kollukadu Village, Pattukottai Taluk, Thanjavur District and hence, representations dated 30.10.2011 and 10.11.2011 were submitted to the authorities, however, the same were not considered.

¶27

2/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶28

W.P.(MD)No.2876 of 2012

¶29

Considering the facts and circumstances of the

¶30

case, this Court is not inclined to keep this matter pending any further. Hence, this Writ Petition stands disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider the representations of the petitioner dated 30.10.2011 and 10.11.2011, if not considered earlier, and if there is any encroachment as claimed by the petitioner, necessary action has be taken by the authorities in accordance with law for removing the encroachment. Such exercise shall be completed within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs.

¶31

[R.M.D., J.] [J.S.N.P., J.] 05.09.2022

¶32

Internet : Yes / No Index : Yes / No sj

¶33

1.The District Collector, Thanjavur, Collectorate, Kachary Road, Thanjavur.

¶34

2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Revenue Divisional Office, Pattukottai.

¶35

3.The Tahsildar, Mathupatti Road, Pattukottai.

¶36

3/5

¶37

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶38

W.P.(MD)No.2876 of 2012

¶39

4/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶40

W.P.(MD)No.2876 of 2012

¶41

R.MAHADEVAN, J.

¶42

and J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD, J.

¶43

¶44

W.P(MD)No.2876 of 2012

¶45

05.09.2022

¶46

5/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

M.Antony v. the District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M.Antony v. the District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Principal Commissioner of Income Tax Vs M/S.Sundaram Bnp Paribas Home Finance Pvt. Ltd.

Commissioner of Income Tax IV Vs Smt.Chandra Ramesh

The Commissioner of Income Tax Vs M/S.Suntv Network Ltd.

R.Moshi Dhayan @Pallavilai Vs the Registrar of Co-Op.

S.R.Ponnumani, Vs the District Collector

N.Kunasingam Vs the District Collectior