Disposed

J.G. Naidu Technical Institute v. the Director

Madras HC11 Jan 2022WP(MD)/450/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A writ petition under Article 226 raising a renewal of approval for a technical institute. The court directed the respondent Additional Director to examine the petitioner's representation and pass orders within two weeks, disposing of the petition without costs.

What did the court decide?

Directed the second respondent to examine the petitioner's representation and pass necessary orders within two weeks.

J.G. Naidu Technical Institute Vs the Director — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2022)

¶1

W.P.(MD) No.450 of 2022

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 11.01.2022 CORAM:

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN W.P.(MD) No.450 of 2022

¶4

and W.M.P(MD)No.350 of 2022

¶5

J.G.Naidu Technical Institute

¶6

(Reg.No.40972),

¶7

Rep. by its Proprietor, R.Hariharan

... Petitioner

vs.

1.The Director,

Directorate of Technical Education (DoTE), 53, Sardar Patel Road,

¶12

Guindy, Chennai-600 025.

¶13

2.The Additional Director (Exam), Directorate of Technical Education (DoTE), 53, Sardar Patel Road, Guindy, Chennai-600 025.

¶14

... Respondents

¶15

PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents herein to grant necessary renewal of approval to the petitioner Institute based on the applications dated 25.11.2019 and 15.11.2021 submitted by the writ petitioner institute within the time limit fixed by this Court.

¶16

For Petitioner : Mr.VR.Shanmuganathan For Respondents : Mr.S.Kameswaran Government Advocate

¶17

O R D E R

¶18

Mr.S.Kameswaran, learned Government Advocate, takes notice on behalf of both the respondents.

¶19

2.The writ petition has been filed in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, seeking renewal of approval to the institute of the petitioner. The petitioner had given necessary applications on 25.11.2019 and again on 15.11.2021.

¶20

3.In the affidavit it had been stated that the petitioner has been running a type writing institute, rather what is called Technical Institute and had applied for renewal for the year 2020 vide application dated 25.11.2019. He claims that he had also paid necessary fees. Again, he had applied for renewal by a further https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶21

1/2

¶22

W.P.(MD) No.450 of 2022

¶23

representation on 15.11.2021. This is an issue, which is entirely under the consideration of the respondents, who may, after application of mind, pass necessary orders.

¶24

4.It would only be proper that some order is passed on the application seeking renewal instead of keeping it pending. Without entering into any further discussion on the facts or on the averments made in the affidavit, a direction is given to the respondents, particularly, the second respondent to examine the representation of the petitioner and pass necessary orders within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt a copy of this order.

¶25

5.With the above observations, the Writ Petition stands disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶26

Assistant Registrar (As)

¶27

// True Copy //

¶28

/ /2022 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)

¶29

sji

¶30

Note:

¶31

In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

¶32

¶33

1.The Director,

¶34

Directorate of Technical Education (DoTE),

¶35

53, Sardar Patel Road,

¶36

Guindy, Chennai-600 025.

¶37

2.The Additional Director (Exam),

¶38

Directorate of Technical Education (DoTE),

¶39

53, Sardar Patel Road,

¶40

Guindy, Chennai-600 025.

¶41

+1 CC to M/s.V.R.SHANMUGANATHAN, Advocate ( SR-1353[F] dated 12/01/2022 )

¶42

+1 CC to M/s.SPL.GP ( SR-1490[F] dated 12/01/2022 )

¶43

W.P.(MD) No.450 of 2022 11.01.2022

¶44

MGJ(27.01.2022) 2P 5C

¶45

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶46

2/2

J.G. Naidu Technical Institute v. the Director

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

J.G. Naidu Technical Institute v. the Director

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ganapathi.a Vs the Inspector General of Registration

Bollore Africa Logistics Vs v.O.Chidambaranar Port Trust

Saraswathi Ammal Vs the District Collector Cum Arbitrator

Karpagam Vs the Special Tahsildar

Thirunavukarasu Vs the District Collector

Govindharasu Vs the Thasildar