Disposed

Ganapathi.a v. the Inspector General of Registration

Madras HC10 Jan 2022WP(MD)/311/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this writ petition under Article 226, the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, via a mandamus, directed the third respondent, District Registrar (Registration), Palayamkottai, to complete ongoing enquiry proceedings regarding a sale deed cancellation before April 30, 2022.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the third respondent to complete enquiry proceedings by 30.04.2022.

Ganapathi.a Vs the Inspector General of Registration — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2022)

¶1

W.P.(MD) No.311 of 2022

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 10.01.2022

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN W.P.(MD) No.311 of 2022

A.Ganapathi

... Petitioner

vs.

1.The Inspector General of Registration,

¶10

Office of the Inspector General of Registration, No.100, Santhome High Road,

¶11

Chennai.

¶12

2.The District Registrar, (Registration), Office of the District Registrar, Tirunelveli.

¶13

3.The District Registrar (Registration), Office of the District Registrar, Palayamkottai,

¶14

Tirunelveli District.

¶15

4.The Sub-Registrar,

¶16

Office of the Sub-Registrar, Kayatharu, Tirunelveli District. ... Respondents

¶17

PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the third respondent to complete the enquiry proceedings, dated 11.10.2021 in Oo.Mu.No.6915/E4/2021 and cancel the sale deed dated 03.08.1993 in Document No.983/1993 registered before the fourth respondent by considering the petitioner's representation, dated 07.10.2021 within the time stipulated by this Court.

¶18

For Petitioner : Mr.T.Thirumurugan

¶19

For Respondents : Mr.N.Satheeshkumar Additional Government Pleader

¶20

O R D E R

¶21

Let me not delve deeply into the facts of the case, but restrict myself to addressing the relief sought, namely, a direction https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ to the third respondent/District Registrar (Registration),

¶22

1/3

¶23

W.P.(MD) No.311 of 2022

¶24

Palayamkottai in Tirunelveli District, to complete the enquiry proceedings which commenced on 11.10.2021 in Oo.Mu.No.6915/E4/2021.

¶25

2.Heard Mr.T.Thirumurugan, learned counsel for the petitioner and also Mr.N.Satheeshkumar, learned Additional Government Pleader, who had taken notice on behalf of the respondents.

¶26

3.The petitioner had also given a representation on 07.10.2021. I restricting myself to issuing a mandamus directing the third respondent to proceed with the enquiry in manner known to law, which implies that notices will have to be issued to all the contesting parties, hear them, give opportunity and thereafter pass necessary orders. A direction is given that such procedure should be commenced, should be proceeded with and should be completed on or before 30.04.2022.

¶27

4.With the above observations, the Writ Petition stands disposed of. No costs.

¶28

// True Copy //

¶29

sji

¶30

Note: In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

¶31

¶32

1.The Inspector General of Registration, Office of the Inspector General of Registration, No.100, Santhome High Road, Chennai.

¶33

2.The District Registrar, (Registration), Office of the District Registrar, Tirunelveli.

¶34

3.The District Registrar (Registration), Office of the District Registrar, Palayamkottai, Tirunelveli District.

¶35

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶36

2/3

¶37

W.P.(MD) No.311 of 2022

¶38

4.The Sub-Registrar, Office of the Sub-Registrar, Kayatharu, Tirunelveli District.

¶39

+1 CC to M/s.SPL GP ( SR-1283[F] dated 11/01/2022 )

¶40

W.P.(MD) No.311 of 2022 10.01.2022

¶41

RD(25.01.2022) 3P 6C

¶42

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶43

3/3

Ganapathi.a v. the Inspector General of Registration

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ganapathi.a v. the Inspector General of Registration

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vijayakumar Vs the Inspector General of Registration

Shanmugam. S Vs the Tahsildar

P.Jeyabalan Vs the District Collector

Bollore Africa Logistics Vs v.O.Chidambaranar Port Trust

Saraswathi Ammal Vs the District Collector Cum Arbitrator

Gandhimathi.P Vs the District Collector