Govindharasu v. the Thasildar
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought direction for survey and boundary marking of properties under Article 226. Court directed Assistant and Surveyors to complete measurement within eight weeks.
What did the court decide?
Direction to First Respondent to proceed with measurement and demarcation of properties with assistance of Second Respondent within eight weeks.
What the court decided
W.P.(MD) No.445 of 2022
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 11.01.2022 CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN W.P.(MD) No.445 of 2022
Govindharasu
... Petitioner
vs.
1.The Thasildar, Karambakudi, Pudukottai District.
2.The Surveyor, Karambakudi Thasildar Office, Pudukottai District. ... Respondents
PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the second respondent to survey and mark the four boundaries of the properties which is to an extent of 0.73.0 ares in S.No.40/7 and 0.06.5 ares in S.No.43/5C and Patta No.72 situated at Paiyadipatti Village, Karambakudi Taluk, Pudukottai District.
For Petitioner : Mr.N.Kamesh
For Respondents : Mr.D.Ghandiraj Special Government Pleader
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the Second Respondent is directed to survey and mark the boundaries of the petitioner's properties measuring 0.73.0 ares in S.No.40/7 and 0.06.5 ares in S.No.43/5C.
Whether the First Respondent must assist the Second Respondent to complete the measurement exercise within eight weeks.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Govindharasu
- respondent
The Thasildar, Karambakudi, Pudukottai District
- respondent
The Surveyor, Karambakudi Thasildar Office, Pudukottai District
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court