This judgment disposed of a writ petition challenging a revenue recommendation report. The court held the report was a recommendation consonant with a civil decree relating to the same property.
The writ petition was disposed of; the Sub Court was directed to number and decide the petitioner's restoration IA within six weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.(MD)No.4112 of 2022
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 20.06.2022
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN
W.P.(MD)No.4112 of 2022
and W.M.P(MD)No.3540 of 2022
G.Palanisamy ... Petitioner
Vs 1.The District Collector, Tiruchirappalli District, Tiruchirappalli – 620 001. 2.The District Revenue Officer, Tiruchirappalli District, Tiruchirappalli – 620 001. 3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Revenue Divisional Office, Paramasivapuram, Lalgudi Taluk, Tiruchirappalli District. 4.The Tahsildar, Lalgudi Taluk Office, Lalgudi, Tiruchirappalli District. 5.Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam, Pudur Uthamanur Branch, Represented by its Treasurer Mr.Tamilarasan Pudur Uthamanur, Lalgudi Taluk – 621 712, Tiruchirappalli District. ... Respondents
Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records pertaining to the impugned recommendation report in e.f.M2/0963/2021 ehs;: 23.11.2021 passed by the fourth respondent and quash the same as illegal and consequently, direct the respondents 1 to 3 to conduct the enquiry without prejudice to the Civil proceeding in A.S.No.112 of 2018 on the file of the Sub Court, Tiruchirappalli in respect of the petitioner property in Old Survey No.133/1A pa, New Natham Survey No.417/8 situated at, Pudur Uthamanur, Lalgudi Taluk, Tiruchirappalli District.
1/3
W.P.(MD)No.4112 of 2022
For Petitioner : Ms.K.Vidhya for.Mr.C.Abdulkalam Azad For Respondents : Mr.K.Balasubramani Special Government Pleader for R.1 to R.4 Mr.N.Ananda Kumar for R.5
ORDER
Heard the learned counsel on either side.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar (CS-I)
// True Copy //
/ /2022 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)
mga
2/3
W.P.(MD)No.4112 of 2022
To 1. The Sub Court, Lalgudi, Tiruchirappalli. 2.The District Collector, Tiruchirappalli District, Tiruchirappalli – 620 001. 3.The District Revenue Officer, Tiruchirappalli District, Tiruchirappalli – 620 001. 4.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Revenue Divisional Office, Paramasivapuram, Lalgudi Taluk, Tiruchirappalli District. 5.The Tahsildar, Lalgudi Taluk Office, Lalgudi, Tiruchirappalli District. +1 CC to M/s.SPL.GP ( SR-27425[F] dated 22/06/2022 ) ORDER MADE IN W.P.(MD)No.4112 of 2022 20.06.2022 PKP/05.07.2022/3P/7C
3/3
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to dispose of the writ petition and direct the Lower Court to decide on the petitionist's restoration application.
Whether the impugned recommendation report in the summary proceeding requires interference by the writ court.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
G.Palanisamy
The District Collector, Tiruchirappalli District
The District Revenue Officer, Tiruchirappalli District
The Revenue Divisional Officer, Paramasivapuram
The Tahsildar, Lalgudi Taluk Office
Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam
G.R. Swaminathan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
