R. Kanniappan, v. Mr. Sivaraju
Case brief
What is this about?
Contempt petitions were closed as the learned Government Advocate submitted that the directions of the Court regarding the petitioner's name change and patta representation had been complied with.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
No.161 of 2020
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 17.06.2022
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN
Cont. P(MD)Nos.161 & 162 of 2020 in W.P.(MD)Nos.516 & 517 of 2019
R.Kanniappan ... Petitioner in Cont P.(MD)No.161 of 2020 Rajalakshmi ... Petitioner in Cont.P.(MD)No.162 of 2020 Vs.
1.Sivaraju The District Collector, Trichirappalli.
2.Sridhar, Tahsildar, Srirangam Taluk, Trichy District. ... Contemnors/ Respondents in both contempt Petitions
Prayer: Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 to issue summons to the respondents and deal with them as per law for having willfully disobeyed the order, dated 28.01.2019 made in W.P.(MD)Nos.516 & 517 of 2019 passed by this Court.
Prayer in WP(MD). 516 of 2019 :
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
R.Kanniappan
- petitioner
Rajalakshmi
- respondent
Sivaraju
- respondent
Sridhar
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court