T.Raj v. Selvaraj
Case brief
What is this about?
The petitioner consented to the closure of a contempt petition after the respondent stated that the direction in the underlying writ petition (W.P.No.12892 of 2019) had been complied with.
What the court decided
Cont. P(MD)No.184 of 2020
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 17.06.2022
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN Cont. P(MD)No.184 of 2020 in W.P.(MD)No.12892 of 2019
T.Raj ... Petitioner/Petitioner Vs.
Selvaraj The Tahsildar, Madurai North Taluk, Madurai. ... Respondent/Contemnor
Prayer: Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 to punish the contemnor/respondent for willfully and deliberately committing contempt of court by willfully disobeying the order of this Court passed in W.P.(MD)No.12892 of 2019, dated 20.06.2019.
Prayer in WP(MD). 12892 OF 2019 :
Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court To issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to consider the representation dated 25.03.2019 of the petitioner and issue patta in his favour and other legal heirs of his wife.
The petitioner is no more.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether contempt proceedings shall be closed upon the submission that the court order has been complied with.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
T.Raj
- respondent
Selvaraj
Coram
G.R.Swaminathan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court