M.Vivek v. The Tahsildar
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition seeking mandamus for removal of fencing, encroachments, and compensation. Court closed the petition granting liberty to the petitioner to approach authorities with grievances and documents.
What did the court decide?
WritPetition is closed with liberty to the petitioner to approach authorities concerned ventilating his grievances enclosing all the required documents.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P(MD)No.4107 of 2020
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 18.11.2022
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD
W.P(MD)No.4107 of 2020
M.Vivek
... Petitioner
vs.
- The Tahsildar, Thiruvaiyaru Taluk, Thanjavur.
- Mr.Antony @ Anthony
- Mr.Ponnuraman
- The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Vigilance and Anti Corruption, Thanjavur. ... Respondents (R4 is suo motu impleaded vide court order dated 15.04.2021 in W.P(MD)No.4107 of 2020)
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to grant liberty to the petitioner to approach authorities and close the writ petition.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
M.Vivek
- respondent
The Tahsildar, Thiruvaiyaru Taluk, Thanjavur
- respondent
Mr.Antony @ Anthony
- respondent
Mr.Ponnuraman
- respondent
The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Vigilance and Anti Corruption, Thanjavur
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court