Petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking removal of encroachment. After hearing, the court closed the petition on the grounds that the prayer was met by authorities, reserving the right to revisit if grievances persist.
Writ petition closed; no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P(MD) No.13983 of 2009
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 18.11.2022
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN and
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD
W.P.(MD) No.13983 of 2009
P.Muppulirajan
... Petitioner
-vs-
_____________ Page 1 of 4_
W.P(MD) No.13983 of 2009
PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 3 to remove the encroachment made in S.No.145/1, Konarpatti Village, Kusavankundu Post, Kuluvankulam Village, Manamadurai (Taluk), Sivagangai District, after following due process of law.
For Petitioner : Mr.T.C.S.Thillai Nayagam For Respondents : Mr.G.V.Vairam Santhosh, Addl. Govt. Pleader for R1 & R2 Mr.M.Rajarajan for R3 Mr.T.K.Gopalan for R4 Mr.J.Karthik for R5 Mr.L.Madhusudhanan for R6 & R7
O R D E R
(Order of the Court was made by R.MAHADEVAN, J.)
This Writ Petition has been filed for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 3 to remove the encroachment made in S.No.145/1, Konarpatti Village, Kusavankundu Post, Kuluvankulam Village, Manamadurai (Taluk), Sivagangai District, after following due process of law.
2 . Today, when the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned
Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents 1 and 2,
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis _____________ Page 2 of 4_
W.P(MD) No.13983 of 2009
on instructions, submitted that the prayer of the petitioner has been met with by the authorities concerned, which is refuted by the learned counsel for the petitioner.
Government Pleader, this Writ Petition is closed leaving it open to the petitioner to approach the authorities concerned, if any of the grievances are not meted out by the respondents. No costs.
[R.M.D., J.] [J.S.N.P., J.] 18.11.2022
vsm
To
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis _____________ Page 3 of 4_
W.P(MD) No.13983 of 2009
R.MAHADEVAN, J. and J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD, J.
vsm
W.P.(MD) No.13983 of 2009
18.11.2022
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis _____________ Page 4 of 4_
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing respondents to remove encroachment after following due process of law.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
P.Muppulirajan
The District Collector, Sivagangai District
The Tahsildar, Manamadurai Taluk
The President, Pottapalayam Panchayat
Kadambarajakani
Jayalakshmi
R.Mahadevan
J.Sathya Narayana Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
