Dismissed

A.Sekar,S/O Anthonysamy, v. the District Collector

Madras HC17 Nov 2022WP(MD)/13217/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Multiple writ petitions challenging 2013 eviction notices were filed in 2022. Finding that no interim order was granted for nearly a decade and due to efflux of time, the Court declined to grant relief, closing the petitions with liberty to approach authorities.

What did the court decide?

All writ petitions closed with liberty to approach authorities concerned to redress grievances, if any.

A.Sekar,S/O Anthonysamy, Vs the District Collector — Landlord and Tenant | Madras HC (2022)

¶1

W.P(MD)Nos.13217 to 13222 of 2013

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 17.11.2022

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN and

¶6

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD

¶7

W.P(MD)Nos.13217 to 13222 of 2013 and

¶8

M.P(MD)Nos.1 to 1 of 2013

¶9

W.P(MD)No.13217 of 2013:-

¶10

A.Sekar ... Petitioner

¶11

vs.

¶12

1.The District Collector, Ramanathapuram District.

¶13

2.The District Revenue Officer, Ramanathapuram District.

¶14

3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Ramanathapuram, Ramanathapuram District.

¶15

4.The Tahsildar, Rameshwaram Taluk, Ramanathapuram District. ... Respondents

¶16

PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records pertaining to Na.Ka.No.A8/815/2012, dated 25.07.2013 on the file

¶17

1/4

¶18

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶19

W.P(MD)Nos.13217 to 13222 of 2013

¶20

of the fourth respondent and to quash the same as illegal, unjust and without jurisdiction and to direct the respondents forbearing to interfere the peaceful possession of the petitioner's house property situated in Survey No.3/2097, Notchivadi, Thankachimadam, Rameswaram Taluk, Ramanathapuram District.

¶21

For Petitioner : Mr.S.A.Ajmal Khan For Respondents : Mr.G.V.Vairam Santhosh Additional Government Pleader

¶22

COMMON ORDER

¶23

(Order of the Court was made by R.MAHADEVAN, J.)

¶24

Challenging the eviction notices, dated 25.07.2013 issued by the fourth respondent, these Writ Petitions have been filed.

¶25

2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents.

¶26

The eviction notices are of the year 2013 and record of proceedings shows that this Court has not granted any interim order stalling the eviction proceedings and due to efflux of time, this Court cannot grant

¶27

2/4

¶28

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶29

W.P(MD)Nos.13217 to 13222 of 2013

¶30

any relief at this juncture. Therefore, all these Writ Petitions are closed with liberty to the petitioners to approach the authorities concerned to redress their grievances, if any. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.

¶31

[R.M.D.,J.] & [J.S.N.P.,J.] 17.11.2022

¶32

Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes ps

¶33

¶34

1.The District Collector, Ramanathapuram District.

¶35

2.The District Revenue Officer, Ramanathapuram District.

¶36

3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Ramanathapuram, Ramanathapuram District.

¶37

4.The Tahsildar, Rameshwaram Taluk, Ramanathapuram District.

¶38

3/4

¶39

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶40

W.P(MD)Nos.13217 to 13222 of 2013

¶41

R.MAHADEVAN,J.

¶42

and

¶43

J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD,J.

¶44

¶45

ORDER MADE IN W.P(MD)Nos.13217 to 13222 of 2013

¶46

17.11.2022

¶47

4/4

¶48

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

A.Sekar,S/O Anthonysamy, v. the District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

A.Sekar,S/O Anthonysamy, v. the District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sargunam .Y Vs the District Collector

Vemban.K Vs the District Collector

P.Pandi Vs the District Collector

Krishnan Vs the District Collector

Marikannu.v Vs the District Collector

Gunasekaran Vs the District Collector