Disposed

Chenthil Arasu v. the District Collector Cum

Madras HC7 Mar 2022WP(MD)/4061/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This writ PIL filed by a petitioner against RTA Regulation and Drivers. The court noted no response to the MPN from the respondents. Directed the third respondent to pass appropriate orders on the representation within four weeks and closed the connected miscellaneous petition.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the third respondent to consider the representation and pass appropriate orders within four weeks.

Chenthil Arasu Vs the District Collector Cum — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2022)

¶1

W.P(MD).No.4061 of 2020

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 07.03.2022

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN

¶6

W.P(MD).No.4061 of 2020 and W.M.P(MD).No.3436 of 2020

Chenthil Arasu

... Petitioner

Vs.

1.The District Collector Cum

¶11

The Regional Transport Authority, Office of the District Collector, Tiruchirappalli.

¶12

2.The Regional Transport Officer, Srirangam,

¶13

Tiruchirappalli District.

¶14

3.The Regional Transport Officer, Tiruchirappalli West, Tiruchirappalli District. ...Respondents

¶15

Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a writ of Mandamus, forbearing the respondents 2 and 3 from interfering or creating trouble during the operation of the petitioner's Mini Buses bearing Reg.Nos.TN-49A-2782 and TN-48-9667, plying on route to Srirangam Girls Higher Secondary School, Via Thiruvanaikovil, Srirangam bus stand, Rajagopuram, based upon the petitioner's representation dated 03.02.2020.

¶16

For Petitioner : Mr.M.Jegadeesh Pandian

¶17

For Respondents : Mr.V.Nirmal Kumar Government Advocate

¶18

ORDER

¶19

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate for the respondents.

¶20

It is noted that the representation of the petitioner, dated 03.02.2020 before the respondents has not invoked any response till https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ date.

¶21

1/2

¶22

W.P(MD).No.4061 of 2020

¶23

Considering the same, I dispose the writ petition by directing the third respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law on the representation of the petitioner, dated 03.02.2020 within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. No costs. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

¶24

// True Copy //

¶25

/ /2022 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)

¶26

¶27

¶28

1.The District Collector Cum The Regional Transport Authority, Office of the District Collector, Tiruchirappalli. 2.The Regional Transport Officer, Srirangam, Tiruchirappalli District. 3.The Regional Transport Officer, Tiruchirappalli West, Tiruchirappalli District. +1 CC to M/s.SPL GP ( SR-10581[F] dated 08/03/2022 )

¶29

W.P(MD).No.4061 of 2020 07.03.2022

¶30

RK(18/03/2022) 2P 5C

¶31

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶32

2/2

Chenthil Arasu v. the District Collector Cum

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Chenthil Arasu v. the District Collector Cum

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Usman Sahib.Y Vs the Chairman

Electa Vs the State of Tamilnadu

Kandasamy.S Vs the Joint Commissioner / Executive Officer

Tamil Nadu Thirukovil Kadaigal Vs the Principal Secretary

Kannan.P Vs the District Collector

Devaki.S Vs the Regional Transport Authority (Cum)