Disposed

Usman Sahib.Y v. the Chairman

Madras HC4 Mar 2022WP(MD)/3968/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Madras High Court, Madurai Bench disposed of a writ petition by directing the Chief Executive Officer of the Tamil Nadu Wakf Board to consider the petitioners' representation dated 27.12.2021 regarding their appointment as Mutawalli within six weeks, without expressing an opinion on merits.

What did the court decide?

Directed the second respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on the petitioners' representation within six weeks.

Usman Sahib.Y Vs the Chairman — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2022)

¶1

WP (MD) No. 3968 of 2022

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 04.03.2022 CORAM

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN

¶4

Writ Petition (MD) No.3968 of 2022 and W.M.P.(MD)No.3407 of 2022

¶5

1.Y.Usman Sahib 2.Y.Amanullah .. Petitioners

¶6

Versus

¶7

1.The Chairman, Tamil Nadu Wakf Board, No.1, Jaffer Syrang Street, Vallal Seethakathi Nagar, Chennai – 600 001.

¶8

2.The Chief Executive Officer, Tamil Nadu Wakf Board, No.1, Jaffer Syrang Street, Vallal Seethakathi Nagar, Chennai – 600 001.

¶9

3.The Wakf Superintendent, Wakf Superintendent's Office, No.27, Diwan Nagar, Court Road, Opp. To Jimma Pallivasal, Thanjavur – 613 001.

¶10

4.Y.Basheer Ahamed .. Respondents

¶11

Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents herein to appoint and allow the petitioners to continue as Mutawalli of Shaick Ibrahim Jailanee Oliyullah Thaikkal Wakf, on considering the petitioners' representation, dated 27.12.2021.

¶12

For Petitioners : Mr.T.S.Mohamed Mohideen For R1 and R2 : Mr.K.K.Senthil, Standing Counsel

¶13

ORDER

¶14

Mr.K.K.Senthil, learned Standing Counsel takes notice for the respondents 1 and 2. By consent, this Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself.

¶15

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶16

1/2

¶17

WP (MD) No. 3968 of 2022

¶18

2.Considering the limited scope of the relief sought for in the present Writ Petition, this Writ Petition is disposed of without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case by directing the second respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law on the representation dated 27.12.2021 of the petitioners, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

¶19

Sd/-

¶20

Assistant Registrar(AD-I)

¶21

// True Copy //

¶22

/ /2022 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)

smn2

1.The Chairman,

Tamil Nadu Wakf Board, No.1, Jaffer Syrang Street, Vallal Seethakathi Nagar, Chennai – 600 001.

¶27

2.The Chief Executive Officer,

¶28

Tamil Nadu Wakf Board, No.1, Jaffer Syrang Street, Vallal Seethakathi Nagar, Chennai – 600 001.

¶29

3.The Wakf Superintendent, Wakf Superintendent's Office, No.27, Diwan Nagar, Court Road, Opp. To Jimma Pallivasal, Thanjavur – 613 001.

¶30

+1 CC to M/s.K.K.SENTHIL, Advocate ( SR-10255[F] dated 07/03/2022 ) +1 CC to M/s.T.S.MOHAMED MOHIDHEEN, Advocate ( SR-10046[F] dated 04/03/2022 )

¶31

WP (MD) No.3968 of 2022 04.03.2022

¶32

IMS(CO)

¶33

TR(18.03.2022) 2P 6C

¶34

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶35

2/2

Usman Sahib.Y v. the Chairman

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Usman Sahib.Y v. the Chairman

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

K.R. Saravanan Vs the Joint Commissioner

Dhanasekharan Vs the Joint Commissioner

Tvl. Sri Amman Metal Works Vs the State Tax Officer

Electa Vs the State of Tamilnadu

Kandasamy.S Vs the Joint Commissioner / Executive Officer

Balaguru.D Vs the Commissioner