Disposed

Dhanasekharan v. the Joint Commissioner

Madras HC3 Mar 2022WP(MD)/3932/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This common order disposed of two writ petitions filed for a Mandamus to restrain respondents from locking, sealing, or dispossessing the petitioners of a shop. The High Court directed authorities to decide the pending representation on merits within four weeks.

What did the court decide?

Directed respondents to pass appropriate orders on merits within four weeks regarding the petitioners' representation; connected miscellaneous petitions closed.

Dhanasekharan Vs the Joint Commissioner — Property and Title | Madras HC (2022)

¶1

W.P(MD).Nos.3932 and 3933 of 2022

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 03.03.2022

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN

¶5

W.P(MD).Nos.3932 and 3933 of 2022 and W.M.P.(MD).Nos.3379 and 3380 of 2022

¶6

W.P.(MD).No.3932 of 2022

Dhanasekharan

... Petitioner

Vs.

1.The Joint Commissioner, Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Department, Mayiladuthurai, Mayiladuthurai District.

¶11

2.The Executive Officer, Adi Kumbheshwarar Thirukkovil, Kumbhakonam, Thanjavur District. ...Respondents

¶12

Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, forbearing Respondents from taking any coercive action qua shop in S.No.1248, Kumbakonam, Thanjavur District in the occupation of the Petitioner by locking and sealing or in any other manner dispossessing the Petitioner without following the due process of law as mandated by the Hon'ble Supreme S.Kumar V. Commissioner 2019 5 SCC 244 and the decision of this court in T.R.Dhamodaran Vs. The Joint Commissioner, W.P(MD)No.791 of 2022 dated 27.01.2022.

¶13

For Petitioner : Mr.M. Mahaboob Athiff For M/S.Ajmal Associates For R1 : Mr.P.Subbaraj Special Government Pleader For R2 : Mr.V.Chandrasekar

¶14

W.P.(MD).No.3933 of 2022

¶15

H.Rajagopalan ... Petitioner

¶16

Vs.

¶17

1.The Joint Commissioner,

¶18

Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Department,

¶19

Mayiladuthurai, Mayiladuthurai District. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶20

1/3

¶21

W.P(MD).Nos.3932 and 3933 of 2022

¶22

2.The Executive Officer, Adi Kumbheshwarar Thirukkovil, Kumbhakonam, Thanjavur District. ...Respondents

¶23

Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, forbearing Respondents from taking any coercive action qua shop in S.No.1248, Kumbakonam, Thanjavur District in the occupation of the Petitioner by locking and sealing or in any other manner dispossessing the Petitioner without following the due process of law as mandated by the Non'ble Supreme S.Kumar v. Commissioner 2019 5 SCC 244 and the decision of this court in T.R.Dhamodaran Vs. The Joint Commissioner, W.P(MD)No.791 of 2022, dated 27.01.2022.

¶24

For Petitioner : Mr.M. Mahaboob Athiff For M/S.Ajmal Associates For R1 : Mr.P.Subbaraj Special Government Pleader For R2 : Mr.V.Chandrasekar

¶25

COMMON ORDER

¶26

The petitioner has filed these writ petitions for a writ of Mandamus forbearing the respondents from taking coercive action qua shop in S.No.1248, Kumbakonam, Thanjavur District in the occupation of the Petitioner by locking and sealing or in any other manner dispossessing the Petitioner without following the due process of law as mandated by the Hon'ble Supreme S.Kumar v. Commissioner 2019 5 SCC 244 and the decision of this court in T.R.Dhamodaran Vs. The Joint Commissioner, W.P(MD)No.791 of 2022, dated 27.01.2022.

¶27

These writ petitions are disposed of by directing the authorities concerned to consider and pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law on the representation of the petitioner, dated 14.02.2022, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. No costs. It is made clear that any action pending consideration of the representation shall be in accordance with law. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.

¶28

Sd/-

¶29

// True Copy //

¶30

/ /2022 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)

¶31

¶32

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶33

2/3

¶34

W.P(MD).Nos.3932 and 3933 of 2022

¶35

¶36

1.The Joint Commissioner, Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Department, Mayiladuthurai, Mayiladuthurai District.

¶37

2.The Executive Officer, Adi Kumbheshwarar Thirukkovil, Kumbhakonam, Thanjavur District.

¶38

+1 CC to M/s.SPL GP ( SR-10204[F] dated 04/03/2022 )

¶39

+2 CC to M/s.AJMAL ASSOCIATES, Advocate ( SR-9964[F] dated 04/03/2022 )

¶40

W.P(MD).Nos.3932 and 3933 of 2022 03.03.2022

¶41

SB(CO) TR(18.03.2022) 3P 6C

¶42

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶43

3/3

Dhanasekharan v. the Joint Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dhanasekharan v. the Joint Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Maragatham P Vs the Senior Regional Manager

M.a.S.E.Nasar Vs The Tamil Nadu Wakf Board

M/S.Matha Wood Industries Vs the Commissioner of Customs

K.R. Saravanan Vs the Joint Commissioner

Tvl. Sri Amman Metal Works Vs the State Tax Officer

Jayaraman.M Vs the Commissioner