3.When the matter was taken up for admission, the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents sought time to file counter. I am however of the view that this is not a case in which relief can be granted to the writ petitioner. It is true that an allegation was made that the funds of the Society has been misappropriated to the tune of Rs.1,68,375/-. It was the petitioner who made good the said loss on various dates by remitting the entire amount. Merely because she was subsequently acquitted in the criminal case, that by itself will not enable the petitioner to reclaim the amount deposited by her. The petitioner in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition had claimed that she was coerced, pressurized, compelled and threatened. Though such serious allegations have been made, the details are completely absent. The petitioner had not stated as to when and where she was threatened. She had not named the person who threatened her. No individual has been implicated in person in this writ petition. Therefore, it is not possible for this Court to investigate the said allegation. It is true that the petitioner has been acquitted. I would not rule out the possibility that the mind of the trial Judge was swayed by the fact that the loss has been made good by the petitioner. The fact is that
