The petitioners, terminated from an outsourced job, filed a writ petition seeking re-appointment instead of challenging the termination order. The court held that challenging the termination was the only open course of action.
Writ Petition dismissed with liberty to the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P(MD)No.21010 of 2022
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 05.09.2022
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN
W.P(MD)No.21010 of 2022 and W.M.P.(MD)No.15253 of 2022
1.S.Ramu
2.R.Vijayasudha
4.S.Kasthuri ... Petitioners
Vs.
1/4
W.P(MD)No.21010 of 2022
Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 18.08.2022.
For Petitioner : Mr.C.Prithiviraj For Respondents : Mr.A.K.Manikkam Special Government Pleader
ORDER
Heard the learned counsel on either side.
05.09.2022 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No rmi
2/4
W.P(MD)No.21010 of 2022
To
W.P(MD)No.21010 of 2022
G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J.
rmi
W.P(MD)No.21010 of 2022
05.09.2022
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a writ petition maintaining a teaching staff who is terminated is maintainable when the petitioners seek re-appointment without challenging the termination order.
S. Ramu
R. Vijayasudha
B. Malalakshmi
S. Kasthuri
The District Collector, Thoothukudi
The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu Corporation for Development of Women
G.R. Swaminathan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
