A.Babu Chandar v. the Chairman
Case brief
What is this about?
The petitioner appeared absent. As the Writ Petition was not prosecuted despite being listed for dismissal, the High Court dismissed it for non-prosecution.
What the court decided
W.P.[MD]No.1898 of 2018
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 01.02.2022 CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH W.P.(MD)No.1898 of 2018 and W.M.P(MD).No.2067 of 2018
...Petitioner
A.Babu Chandar
/Vs./
- 1.The Chairman, Indian Overseas Bank,
Anna Salai, Chennai.
- 2.The General Manager, The Appellate Authority, Indian Overseas Bank, Anna Salai, Chennai.
- 3.The Deputy General Manager, Disciplinary Authority, Indian Overseas Bank, Anna Salai, Chennai. ...Respondents
PRAYER:- Writ Petition - filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records of the second respondent impugned order DO.VIG.GM (VS/AA:8464:3611:2017-18, dated 31.08.2017 and quash the same as illegal and directing the respondents to reinstate the petitioner with continuity of service with backwages.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
A.Babu Chandar
- respondent
The Chairman, Indian Overseas Bank
- respondent
The General Manager, The Appellate Authority, Indian Overseas Bank
- respondent
The Deputy General Manager, Disciplinary Authority, Indian Overseas Bank
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court