Allowed

S.Jeganathapillai, v. the District Collector

Madras HC31 Jan 2022WP(MD)/15286/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution, the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court directed the respondents to process the petitioner's pending application and option form seeking revised pension benefits under G.O.Ms.No.363 dated 23.08.2013 within four weeks, despite filing delays.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the respondents to process the petitioner's application dated 11.11.2013 and represention dated 13.03.2017 within four weeks.

S.Jeganathapillai, Vs the District Collector — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2022)

¶1

W.P.(MD)No.15286 of 2019

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 31.01.2022 CORAM:

¶3

THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH W.P.(MD)No.15286 of 2019

S.Jeganathapillai

...Petitioner

/Vs./

1.The District Collector, Nagercoil, Kanniyakumari District.

¶8

2.The Tahsildar, Agastheeswaram Taluk, Nagercoil, Kanniyakumari District.

¶9

...Respondents

¶10

PRAYER:- Writ Petition - filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to proceed further with the “option form” and application dated 11.11.2013 submitted by the petitioner and revise the scale of pay for availing the monetary pension benefits under G.O.Ms.No.363, Finance (PGC) Department dated 23.08.2013.

¶11

For Petitioner : Mr.Kannan for Mr.M.Krishna Sreethar For Respondents : Mr.A.K.Manikkam,

¶12

Special Government Pleader

¶13

O R D E R

¶14

The petitioner was 82 years, when the writ petition was filed in July 2019. He superannuated on 31.10.1995 as Office Assistant at Agastheeswaram Taluk, Kanniaykumari District and he has been receiving pension. He takes benefit of G.O.Ms.No.363, Finance [PGC] Department dated 23.08.2013, ordering revision of pension of those retirees between 01.06.1988 to 31.12.1995, with reference to prerevised scale of pay (i.e.,) prior to 01.06.1988. He has filed an application along with Option Form on 11.11.2013, seeking the benefit of revision of pay of pension, but, is yet to receive the benefits as claimed.

¶15

Though there is some delay in filing the application itself, MrA.K.Manikkam, learned Special Government Pleader would not very seriously object to this Court directing the respondents to process the application dated 11.11.2013 and the detailed representation of the petitioner dated 13.03.2017. Thus, a direction is issued to R2/Tahsildar to process the application dated 11.11.2013 and pass necessary orders within a period of four weeks from today.

¶16

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶17

1/2

¶18

W.P.(MD)No.15286 of 2019

¶19

This Writ Petition is disposed with the above directions. No costs.

¶20

Sd/-

¶21

Assistant Registrar (CS-II)

¶22

// True Copy //

¶23

/ /2022 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) ssb Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned. To 1.The District Collector, Nagercoil, Kanniyakumari District. 2.The Tahsildar, Agastheeswaram Taluk, Nagercoil, Kanniyakumari District. +1 CC to M/s.M.KRISHNA SREETHAR, Advocate (SR-3789[F] dated 02/02/2022 ) +1 CC to M/s.SPL.GP ( SR-3697[F] dated 02/02/2022 ) Order made in W.P.(MD)No.15286 of 2019 Dated: 31.01.2022 NA(CO) GC(08.02.2022) 2P 5C

¶24

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶25

2/2

S.Jeganathapillai, v. the District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

S.Jeganathapillai, v. the District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

P.Rani, W/O.Stephen Immanuel, Vs the Secretary to Govt

Anandasamy Vs Union of India

R.Alagarsamy Vs State Express Transport

B.Seenivasan, Vs the General Manager

A.Mariappan, S/O.Arunachalam Vs the Member Secretary

P.Valliammal Vs the District Collector