The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court dismissed a writ petition as infructuous because the period involved had expired. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition was closed.
No costs. Connected miscellaneous petition closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P(MD)No.18567 of 2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 06.09.2022
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR
W.P(MD)No.18567 of 2013 and
M.P(MD)No.1 of 2013
SEP Energy (p) Ltd.,
represented by its Director ... Petitioner
Vs.
Chennai-02.
Tirunelveli.
... Respondents
1/4
W.P(MD)No.18567 of 2013
PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 12.09.2013.
For Petitioner : Mr.Raguvaran Gopalan For Respondents : Mr.S.Deenadhayalan Standing Counsel
ORDER
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the period involved in this writ petition has been expired.
2.Recording the submission made by the learned counsel
appearing for the petitioner, nothing survives for further adjudication in this petition. Hence, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous Petition is closed.
06.09.2022
Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No
vsg
2/4
W.P(MD)No.18567 of 2013
3/4
W.P(MD)No.18567 of 2013
R.VIJAYAKUMAR ,J.
vsg
Order made in W.P(MD)No.18567 of 2013 and M.P(MD)No.1 of 2013
Dated: 06.09.2022
4/4
SEP Energy (p) Ltd.
Chief Engineer/NCES, TANGEDCO
Chief Financial Officer, TANGEDCO
Superintending Engineer, Tirunelveli Distribution Circle, TANGEDCO
Superintending Engineer, Chennai Electricity Distribution Circle/South, TANGEDCO
R. Vijayakumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
