T.Venkatraman v. the Assistant Executive
Case brief
What is this about?
A writ petition filed under Article 226 seeking a writ of Certiorari and Mandamus was closed due to the death of the petitioner, with liberty given to legal heirs to reopen.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P(MD)No.12490 of 2012
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 05.09.2022
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR
W.P(MD)No.12490 of 2012 and M.P(MD)No.1 of 2012
T.Venkatraman ... Petitioner
Vs.
- 1.The Assistant Executive Engineer, Operation and Maintenance (West), Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, TANGEDCO Thuraiyur, Trichy District.
- 2.The Superintending Engineer, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Mannarpuram, Trichy. ... Respondents
PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records of the first respondent in his proceedings AEE/W/TYR/F.Theft/DKT/D.No.371/12 dated 31.08.2012 and quash the same and forbearing the respondents from collecting the amounts specified in the said notice.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
T.Venkatraman
- respondent
The Assistant Executive Engineer, Operation and Maintenance (West), Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, TANGEDCO
- respondent
The Superintending Engineer, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court