Selvaraj, S/O.Vellaiyan, v. the Asst. Executive Engineer
Madras HCWP(MD)/12546/2012
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The writ petition filed by Selvaraj was closed without any substantive consideration because the petitioner's counsel had passed away and the notice sent to him was returned as undelivered due to an incomplete address.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
W.P(MD)No.12546 of 2012
¶2
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
¶3
DATED: 05.09.2022
¶4
CORAM
¶5
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR
¶6
W.P(MD)No.12546 of 2012 and
¶7
M.P(MD)No.1 of 2012
¶8
Selvaraj
¶9
... Petitioner
¶10
Vs.
¶11
- 1.The Assistant Executive Engineer, Operation and Maintenance (West), Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, TANGEDCO Thuraiyur, Trichy District.
¶12
- 2.The Superintending Engineer, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Mannarpuram, Trichy. ... Respondents
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Selvaraj
- respondent
Assistant Executive Engineer, Operation and Maintenance (West), Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, TANGEDCO Thuraiyur, Trichy District
- respondent
Superintending Engineer, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Mannarpuram, Trichy
Coram
AI extract
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court