Petitioner challenged proposed construction blocking public streets. Respondents submitted that construction was already stayed by the District Collector. Court held the matter required no further adjudication and closed the petition.
Petition closed with no further adjudication; no costs awarded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P(MD) No.11918 of 2018
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 15.09.2022
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN and
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD
W.P.(MD) No.11918 of 2018 and
W.M.P(MD) No.10879 of 2018
R.Jeyadevan
... Petitioner
-vs-
PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 07.05.2018 and direct them not to construct or permit anybody to make constructions in and along the
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis _____________ Page 1 of 4_
W.P(MD) No.11918 of 2018
public streets at Maradi Village, Thuraiyur Taluk, Trichy District blocking free passage for men, carts and cattle and also blocking free flow of traffic.
For Petitioner : Mr.V.Singan For Respondents : Mr.V.Nirmal Kumar, Government Advocate for R1 & R3 Mr.K.Mu.Muthu for R2
O R D E R
(Order of the Court was made by R.MAHADEVAN, J.)
The petitioner has come forward with this writ petition praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 07.05.2018 and not to permit anyone to put up construction in and along the public streets at Maradi Village in Tiruchirappalli District.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis _____________ Page 2 of 4_
W.P(MD) No.11918 of 2018
survives for further adjudication in this matter. Accordingly, this Writ Petition stands closed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
[R.M.D., J.] [J.S.N.P., J.] 15.09.2022
Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No pkn
To:
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis _____________ Page 3 of 4_
W.P(MD) No.11918 of 2018
R.MAHADEVAN, J. and J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD, J.
pkn
W.P.(MD) No.11918 of 2018
15.09.2022
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis _____________ Page 4 of 4_
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a Writ of Mandamus should be issued to prevent construction in public streets given prior stay proceedings.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
R.Jeyadevan
The State rep. by The District Collector, Tiruchirappalli
The Block Development Officer, Uppiliyapuram, Thuraiyur Taluk, Trichy District
The Tahsildar, Thuraiyur, Trichy District
R.Mahadevan
J.Sathya Narayana Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
