The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a stay on administrative action regarding a sale deed pending final court decrees. The court noted that counsel argued the issue was already settled between the parties, rendering the petition infructuous, and dismissed it accordingly.
The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.No.5859 of 2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 15.12.2022
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SURESH KUMAR
W.P.No.5859 of 2015 and M.P.No.1 of 2015
R.Nallasamy
... Petitioner
Vs
3.Vallianna Gounder ... Respondents
Prayer : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the 1st respondent not to pursue action on the representation of the 3rd respondent dated 18.08.2014 with reference to the Sale Deed dated 04.08.2014 registered as Document No.5199 of 2014 on the file of the Sub-Registry of Komarapalayam without reference to the decrees to be passed in O.S.No.176 of 2014 on the file of the District Court of Namakkal and O.S.No.349 of 2014 on the file of the District Munsif Court of Thiruchengodu.
W.P.No.5859 of 2015
For Petitioner : Mr.Kandhan Duraisami For Respondents : Mrs.Akila Rajendran Government Advocate for R1 & R2 : Ms.R.Meenal for R3
O R D E R
The learned counsel appearing for both sides submits that, the issue
raised in this writ petition has been settled already between the parties, therefore it has become infructuous.
infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is also dismissed.
15.12.2022
Index : Yes/No Speaking Order : Yes/No
Sgl
W.P.No.5859 of 2015
To
W.P.No.5859 of 2015
R.SURESH KUMAR, J.
Sgl
W.P.No.5859 of 2015
15.12.2022
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the writ petition maintaining a stay on action regarding a sale deed should be allowed given that the issue was already settled.
Whether the petition, having become infructuous due to settlement between parties, requires adjudication.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
R.Nallasamy
The District Registrar, Namakkal
The Revenue Divisional Officer, Thiruchengodu
Vallianna Gounder
R.Suresh Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
