In a contempt petition filed for alleged disobedience of a Court order, the respondent's counsel submitted that compliance was made, a statement uncontroverted by the petitioner. The Court accepted this and closed the petition.
No relief granted as the petition was closed due to established compliance.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Cont.P.No.2203 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 15.12.2022
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SURESH KUMAR
Cont.P.No.2203 of 2022
1.K.Saroja 2.R.Kalaivani 3.K.Kannan 4.K.Sekar
…. Petitioners
-Vs-
Mohamed Rafi Tahsildar, Velachery Taluk Taramani 100 Feet Road Chennai 600 113.
…. Respondents
Prayer : Contempt Petition under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 to punish the respondent for wilful disobedience of the order passed by this Hon'ble Court dated 20.04.2021 in W.P.No.32231 of 2017.
For Petitioner : Ms,Karthikaa Ashok For Respondents : Ms.Akila Rajendran Government Advocate
O R D E R
This Contempt Petition has been filed for the alleged disobedience of the orders
passed by this Court dated 20.04.2021 in W.P.No.32231 of 2017.
1 / 2
Cont.P.No.2203 of 2022
R. SURESH KUMAR, J.
KST
15.12.2022
Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No KST To
Mohamed Rafi Tahsildar, Velachery Taluk Taramani 100 Feet Road Chennai 600 113.
Cont.P.No.2203 of 2022
2 / 2
1 provisions across 1 enactments
K.Saroja
R.Kalaivani
K.Kannan
K.Sekar
Mohamed Rafi
R. Suresh Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
