_petitioner filed a writ petition seeking to quash an order and direct disbursement of claim amount. The petitioner was absent throughout the proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 20.10.2022
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR
W.P.No.30036 of 2012 and
M.P No.1 of 2012
S.Balakrishnan
... Petitioner
Vs.
Writ petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, seeking a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records relating to the order of the 3rd respondent herein in proceedings dated 10.10.2011 in Ref.letter No.R.R.1/28230/07 and quash the same and consequently direct the respondents herein to sanction and disburse the claim amount as per the survey reports for the vessel B.T.Selvi C.L.R. 164.
For Petitioner : No appearance
For Respondents : Mr.D.Gopal, Government Advocate
2
N.SATHISH KUMAR,J.
vum
O R D E R
There was no representation for the petitioner on several
occasions. Even today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, there is
no representation for the petitioner. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non prosecution. No costs. Consequently connected miscellaneous
petition is closed.
20.10.2022
Index: Yes/No
Speaking order/Non speaking order vum
To
W.P.No.30036 of 2012 and M.P No.1 of 2012
S. Balakrishnan
The State Tamil Nadu
Special Commissioner, Revenue Administration
District Collector, Cuddalore
N. Sathish Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
