High Court dismissed a writ petition seeking quashing of an order and refund of excess interest as the petitioner failed to appear for hearing with no representation on record.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 20.10.2022
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR
W.P.No.25850 of 2013
G.Indira
... Petitioner
Vs.
....Respondents
Writ petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, seeking a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records of the 2nd respondent in their letter No.H.R.11/6282/1994 dated 14.12.2012 through 2nd respondent to quash the same as unconstitutional and direct the 2nd respondent and refund the excess interest and penal interest of Rs.1,10,471/- collected from him from the date of Allotment and the date of demand made upto 02.12.2004 as per the order of this Court.
2
N.SATHISH KUMAR,J.
vum
O R D E R
There was no representation for the petitioner on earlier occasions.
Even today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, there is no representation for the petitioner. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non prosecution. No costs.
20.10.2022
Index: Yes/No Speaking order/Non speaking order vum
To
W.P.No.25850 of
2013
G. Indira
Tamilnadu Housing Board
N. Sathish Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
