Disposed

M/S.Aalim Muhammed Salegh v. The Director General of Employment and Training

Madras HC4 Jan 2022WP/23515/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Madras issued a direction to the Director General of Training to consider a representation by the petitioner college regarding pending National Trade Certificates for students and pass appropriate orders within six weeks.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 22.10.2019 and pass appropriate orders within six weeks.

M/S.Aalim Muhammed Salegh Vs The Director… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 04.01.2022

¶2

CORAM:

¶3

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI

¶4

W.P.No.23515 of 2021

¶5

M/s. Aalim Muhammed Salegh College of Industrial Training Centre, Rep by its Secretary, Mr. Segu Jamaludeen, S/o.Mr. Seyed Mohamed Buhari, Nizara Educational Campus, Avadi-I.A.F, Chennai-600 055.

¶6

...Petitioner vs.

¶7

The Director General of Employment & Training, Ministry of Labour, Sharam Shakthi Bhavan, Rafi Marg, New Delhi-110 001. Now Changed as The Director General of Training, Ministry of MSDE, Employment Exchange Building, 1^st Floor, IARI Comples, Library Avenue Road, Pusa Complex, New Delhi. 2. The Director of Employment and Training, Guindy, Chennai-32. ... Respondents PRAYER:

¶8

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, is issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1^st respondent to issue National Trade Certificate to the 66 Students of the petitioner Institute who were issued with Provisional Certificates by the 2^nd Respondent.

¶9

For Petitioner : Mr.S.R.R. Raaghhavan

¶10

For Respondents : Mr. Thirumalaisamy

¶11

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶12

ORDER

¶13

The petitioner has filed this petition seeking issuance of Writ of Mandamus directing the 1^st respondent to issue National Trade Certificate to the 66 Students of the petitioner Institute who were issued with Provisional Certificates by the 2^nd Respondent.

¶14

Mr. Thirumalaisamy, takes notice for the respondents.

¶15

.The case of the petitioner is that the petitioner is the secretary of the college of Industrial Training Centre which was established in the year 1993 with a view to offer National Vocational Training Courses to the students for which the petitioner institute applied for affiliation for the 1^st unit of said course in the year 1993 with the 1^st respondent. However, after series of inspections, the petitioner's college was affiliated in the year 1997. While being so, the permission was granted to admit the students in the above said course during the years 1993-1995 & 1994-1996 in anticipation of affiliation by the 1^st respondent. On the strength of the aforesaid permission, students were permitted to write All India Trade Test examinations in the year 1993, for which the provisional National Trade Certificates were also issued by the 2^nd Respondent.

¶16

Such being the case, though the students of the said college during the years 1993 – 1996 came out successful in their examinations, till date, they could not get their National Trade Certificates registered. On the earlier occasion a Writ Petition in W.P.No.38340 of 2005 was filed before a learned single Judge of this Court by similarly placed persons, which was dismissed. However, the said order was challenged in W.A.No.801 of 2006 wherein the Division Bench of this Court had modified the said order on 07.08.2009 against which Special Leave Petition in S.L.P.No.3596 of 2020 was filed by the 1^st respondent in the Hon'ble Apex Court and the same was dismissed confirming the order of the Division Bench of this Court. Thereafter, the petitioner made a representation dated 22.10.2019 to the respondents herein with regard to issuance of National Trade Certificates. However, till date the same has not been considered by the respondents. Hence, the present Writ Petition is filed seeking grant of relief to the petitioner , in line with the Judgement passed in W.A.No.801 of 2006.

¶17

Though very many grounds have been raised, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that it would suffice if this Court directs the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 22.10.2019 and pass appropriate orders on the same in line with the judgement passed by this Court in

¶18

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶19

W.A.No.801 of 2006, within the time frame fixed by this Court.

¶20

Learned Government Advocate appearing for respondents

¶21

submits that petitioner's representation will be considered and appropriate orders will be passed on the same in accordance with law within the time frame fixed by this Court.

¶22

Heard the learned counsel on the either side.

¶23

In view of the aforesaid submissions, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case directs the Respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 22.10.2019 and pass appropriate orders on the same in accordance with law, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶24

Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of with the

¶25

aforesaid direction. No costs.

¶26

Sd/-

¶27

Assistant Registrar(CS V)

¶28

//True Copy//

¶29

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶30

NHS

¶31

¶32

The Director General of Training, Ministry of MSDE,

¶33

Employment Exchange Building,

¶34

1^st Floor, IARI Comples,

¶35

Library Avenue Road,

¶36

Pusa Complex, New Delhi.

¶37

The Director of Employment and Training, Guindy, Chennai-32.

¶38

+1cc to Mr.S.R.R. Raaghhavan, Advocate, S.R.No.923 +1cc to Mr. Thirumalaisamy, Advocate, S.R.No.417

W.P.No.23515 of 2021

PVS(CO)

CT 15/03/2022

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

M/S.Aalim Muhammed Salegh v. The Director General of Employment and Training

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S.Aalim Muhammed Salegh v. The Director General of Employment and Training

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

63 Moons Technologies Ltd., Vs Secretariat of Lokpal

S.Shanthi Vs Murugesh I.A.S.

V.Sathya Vs The Managing Director

R.Prabhu Vs The Appellate Authority under Maintance and

India Awake for Transparency, Vs The Secretary

C.S.Parthasarthy Vs The Registrar of Societies