Single judge order dismissing a writ petition for Mandamus as infructuous by the petitioner's representative citing that the relief sought is no longer tenable.
Petition dismissed as infructuous with no costs; no substantive relief granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 04.01.2022 CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI
W.P.No.13497 of 2020
and W.M.P.Nos.16677 and 19000 of 2020
1.C.S.Parthasarathy
2.P.Uuvarja Sundaram
... Petitioners
Vs.
1.The Registrar of Societies, Chennai North, Chennai.
rep.by its Secretary,
No.59 and 60, Rasappa Chetty Street, Chennai 600 003. ...Respondents
Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the 1st Respondent herein to consider and dispose Petitioners Representation dated 3.7.2020 by appointing a Special officer to handle the affairs of the 2nd Respondent and to conduct elections as per its Bye Laws.
For Petitioners : Mr.S.P.Arthi For R1 : No appearance
O R D E R
When the matter is taken up for consideration, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the prayer sought for in the present Writ Petition become infructuous and hence prays for closure of this petition.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS V)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
sk
To
The Registrar of Societies, Chennai North, Chennai.
W.P.No.13497 of 2020
BS(CO) A.SK(16/03/2022)
C.S. Parthasarathy
P. Uuvarja Sundaram
The Registrar of Societies, Chennai North
Kandhakotta Ayira Vysiya Berri Chettiar Samooga Munnetra Sangam
M. Dhandapani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
