A writ petition filed for a Writ of Certiorari and Mandamus to quash a notice was dismissed as infructuous because the petitioner abandoned relief sought by efflux of time.
Petition dismissed as infructuous; connected miscellaneous petitions closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P. No. 20596 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 02.12.2022
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.D. AUDIKESAVALU
W.P. No. 20596 of 2022 and W.M.P. No. 19719 and 19720 of 2022
E.Elangovan
… Petitioner
-vs-
Prayer:- Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, 1950, praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to the order in impugned notice dated 16.07.2022 bearing No. RC. No. 141/ACP/E&W/Form “A”/22 passed by the Fourth Respondent and quash the same. Consequently forbear the Second Respondent in anyway interefering with the peaceful enjoyment of the premise door no. L3, Singara Garden, Old Washermanpet, Chennai – 600021.
1/3
W.P. No. 20596 of 2022
For Petitioner : Mr. B.Leelesh Sundaram for M/s. Nathan and Associates For Respondents : Ms. R.Rajeswari, Government Advocate
O R D E R
Learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner submits that by efflux of
time, the relief sought in this Writ Petition does not remain for consideration,
and he has made an endorsement to that effect in the court record.
02.12.2022
Maya Index: Yes/No
Note: Issue order copy by 16.12.2022.
To
2/3
W.P. No. 20596 of 2022
P.D. AUDIKESAVALU, J.
Maya
W.P. No. 20596 of 2022
02.12.2022
3/3
1 provisions across 1 enactments
E.Elangovan
The Commissioner of Police, Greater Chennai Corporation
The Estate Officer, Estate Welfare & Community Policing, Greater Chennai Police
P.D. Audikesavalu
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
