The petitioner sought a writ of mandamus directing respondents to dispose of a representation. However, the petitioner withdrew the petition, and the court dismissed the writ as withdrawn, closing the connected miscellaneous petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P. No. 1517 of 2020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 01.12.2022
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.D. AUDIKESAVALU
W.P. No. 1517 of 2020 and
W.M.P. No. 1789 of 2020
B.Ramakrishna Reddy … Petitioner
-vs-
1/4
W.P. No. 1517 of 2020
Prayer:- Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, 1950, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the First to Fifth Respondents to consider and dispose the Petitioner's representation dated 07.11.2019 within the stipulated time as prescribed by this Court.
For Petitioner : Mr. R.Balaguruswamy For Respondents : Mr. N.R.R.Arun Natarajan, Special Government Pleader (for R1 to R5) M/s. A.C.Manibharathi (for R6 & R7)
O R D E R
Learned Counsel for the Petitioner seeks permission of the Court to
withdraw the Writ Petition and he has made an endorsement to that effect in the court record.
Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. No costs.
01.12.2022
vjt Index: Yes/No Note: Issue order copy by 15.12.2022.
2/4
W.P. No. 1517 of 2020
To
3/4
W.P. No. 1517 of 2020
P.D. AUDIKESAVALU, J.
vjt
W.P. No. 1517 of 2020
01.12.2022
4/4
1 provisions across 1 enactments
B.Ramakrishna Reddy
Tamilnadu Hindu Religious & Endowment Board
R.Madhavan
Govindan
P.D. Audikeshavalu
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
