Lakshmi v. The Secretary
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought writ to direct respondent to complete disciplinary enquiry. Court closed petition, noting disciplinary proceedings were forwarded to Bar Council of India, leaving petitioner to approach that authority.
What did the court decide?
No costs; petition closed; petitioner to approach the authority with all grounds.
What the court decided
W.P.No.20093 of 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 14.12.2022
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN and
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD
W.P.No.20093 of 2021
Lakshmi .. Petitioner
Versus
The Secretary, Bar Council of Tamilnadu & Puducherry, High Court Campus, Chennai. .. Respondent
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to complete the enquiry pertaining to the petitioner's Complaint No.321 of 2020 dated 09.11.2020 with a time frame as fixed by this Court.
For Petitioner : Mr.D.R.Arun Kumar For Respondent : Mr.C.K.Chandrasekaran
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Lakshmi
- respondent
The Secretary, Bar Council of Tamilnadu & Puducherry
Coram
R. MAHADEVAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court