Dismissed

Arapporlyakkam v. Kcp Infra Limited

Madras HC14 Dec 2022OSA/134/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This judgment records that the three appeared original side appeals were listed for withdrawal on 14.12.2022. With permission granted and endorsement provided, the appeals were dismissed as withdrawn, resulting in the closure of connected miscellaneous petitions.

What did the court decide?

Appeals O.S.A. Nos. 134 to 136 of 2022 dismissed as withdrawn; connected miscellaneous petitions closed.

Arapporlyakkam Vs Kcp Infra Limited — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Madras HC (2022)

¶1

O.S.A. Nos. 134 to 136 of 2022

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 14.12.2022

¶4

CORAM :

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD

¶6

O.S.A. Nos. 134 to 136 of 2022 and C.M.P. Nos. 8396, 8306 and 8307 of 2022

¶7

O.S.A. No. 134 of 2022:- ArapporIyakkam

¶8

.. Appellant/Applicant/3^rd Defendant

¶9

Vs.

¶10

M/s. KCP Infra Limited No.4, Ground Floor Aalayam Space, Anandha Road Alwarpet, Chennai-600 018. Represented by its Managing Director K.Chandraprakash [Amended as per order dated 24.01.2022 in Application No. 150 of 2022] .. Respondent/Respondent/Plaintiff

¶11

Google LLC 1600, Amphitheatre Parkway Mountain View, California United States.

¶12

Youtube LLC 901, Cherry Avenue San Bruno, California United States.

¶13

..Respondents/Respondents/Defendants

¶14

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶15

1/5

¶16

O.S.A. Nos. 134 to 136 of 2022

¶17

Appeal filed under XXXVI Rule 9 of Original Side Rules read with Clause 15 of Letters Patent against the order dated 15.02.2022 in Application No. 3384 of 2021 in C.S. No. 150 of 2021 and thereby reject the plaint in C.S. No. 150 of 2021.

¶18

O.S.A. No. 135 of 2022:- Arappor Iyakkam .. Appellant/Applicant/2^nd Defendant

¶19

Vs.

¶20

R.Chandrasekar .. Respondent/ Respondent/ Plaintiff

¶21

Meta Platform Inc. 1601 Willow Road Menlo Park, California 94025 United States. [Amended as per order dated 24.01.2022 in Application No. 221 of 2022] ..Respondent/Respondent/1^st Defendant

¶22

Appeal filed under XXXVI Rule 9 of Original Side Rules read with Clause 15 of Letters Patent against the order dated 15.02.2022 in Application No. 2058 of 2021 in C.S. No. 72 of 2021 and thereby reject the plaint in C.S. No. 72 of 2021.

¶23

O.S.A. No. 136 of 2022:- ArapporIyakkam .. Appellant/Applicant/2^nd Defendant

¶24

Vs.

¶25

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 2/5

¶26

O.S.A. Nos. 134 to 136 of 2022

¶27

M/s. KCP Infra Limited

¶28

No.4, Ground Floor Aalayam Space, Anandha Road Alwarpet, Chennai-600 018. Represented by its Managing Director K.Chandrasekar [Amended as per order dated 24.01.2022 in Application No. 147 of 2022] .. Respondent/ Respondent/ Plaintiff

¶29

Meta Platform Inc. 1601 Willow Road Menlo Park, California 94025 United States. [Amended as per order dated 24.01.2022 in Application No. 220 of 2022] ..Respondent/Respondent/1^st Defendant

¶30

Appeal filed under XXXVI Rule 9 of Original Side Rules read with Clause 15 of

¶31

Letters Patent to set aside the order dated 15.02.2022 in Application No. 2059 of 2021 in C.S. No. 22 of 2021 and thereby reject the plaint in C.S. No. 22 of 2021.

¶32

For Appellant : M/s. N.S.Tanvi (In all Wps) For Respondents : M/s. C.Daniel (In all Wps)

¶33

C O M M O N J U D G M E N T

¶34

3/5

¶35

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶36

O.S.A. Nos. 134 to 136 of 2022

¶37

(Judgment of the Court was made by R. MAHADEVAN, J.)

¶38

Based on the letters dated 23.11.2022 sent by the learned counsel for the

¶39

appellant to the Registry, these appeals are listed today under the caption “for withdrawal”.

¶40

The learned counsel appearing for the appellant seeks permission of this Court to withdraw these original side appeals. She has also made an endorsement to that effect. In view of the same, these appeals are dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

¶41

[R.M.D., J.] [J.S.N.P., J.] 14.12.2022

¶42

Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No

¶43

Maya

¶44

¶45

The Sub Assistant Registrar (Original Side) High Court, Madras.

¶46

The Section Officer, VR Section, High Court, Madras.

¶47

4/5

¶48

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶49

O.S.A. Nos. 134 to 136 of 2022

¶50

R. MAHADEVAN, J. and J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD, J.

¶51

Maya

¶52

O.S.A. Nos. 134 to 136 of 2022

¶53

Dated : 14.12.2022

¶54

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 5/5

Arapporlyakkam v. Kcp Infra Limited

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Arapporlyakkam v. Kcp Infra Limited

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Radhakrishnan.a Vs The Secretary to Government

Devasahayam D Vs The Principal Secretary to Government

S.Arunachalam, Vs B.Suganya

Ms.Ramya Peterraj Vs The Secretary

Lakshmi Vs The Secretary

S.J.Johnson Vs The Secretary