S.Arunachalam, v. B.Suganya
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court dismissed the civil miscellaneous appeal as abated, holding that the sole appellant had passed away prior to the hearing.
What did the court decide?
The civil miscellaneous appeal was dismissed as abated.
What the court decided
C.M.A.No.1351 of 2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 13.12.2022
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD
C.M.A.No.1351 of 2018
S.Arunachalam .. Appellant
Versus
B.Suganya .. Respondent
Prayer : Appeal filed under Section 19 of Family Court Act, 1984, to set aside the order and decree dated 22.08.2017 made in G.W.O.P.No.6 of 2015 passed by the Family Court, Erode.
For Appellant : M/s.Zeenath Begum For Respondent : Mr.S.Rajmakesh
Parties & counsel
- appellant
S.Arunachalam
- respondent
B.Suganya
Coram
R. MAHADEVAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court