Disposed

K.Sarbudeen v. The District Collector

Madras HC4 Jul 2022WP/16451/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This single-judge bench disposed of a writ petition filed seeking directions to remove encroachments on public roads. The court directed the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation within three months and remove any found encroachment.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondents to consider petitioner's representation within three months and remove any encroachment found.

K.Sarbudeen Vs The District Collector — Public Procurement and Tenders | Madras HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 04.07.2022

¶3

CORAM :

¶4

THE HON'BLE MR.MUNISHWAR NATH BHANDARI, CHIEF JUSTICE

¶5

AND

¶6

THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE N.MALA

¶7

W.P.No.16451 of 2022

¶8

K.Sarbudeen .. Petitioner Vs 1.The District Collector, Chengalpattu District, Chengalpattu. 2.The Revenue Divisional officer, Thirukazhukundram, Chengalpattu District. 3.The Tahsildar, Thirukazhukundram, Chengalpattu District. 4.The Executive Officer, Town Panchayat, Thirukazhukundram, Chengalpattu District. .. Respondents Prayer : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a writ of mandamus directing the 1st and 2nd respondents to consider the petitioner representation dated 26.3.2022 and to remove the encroachment on public road situated at market road and Masuthi street in Ward 10 & 15, Thirukazhukundram Panchayat, Thirukazhukundram Taluk, Chengalpattu District. For the Petitioner : Mr.K.Anbuselvan

¶9

For the Respondents : Mr.J.Ravindran Addl. Advocate General assisted by Mr.A.Selvendran Spl. Government Pleader for respondent Nos.1 to 3

¶10

ORDER

¶11

(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice)

¶12

This writ petition has been filed to seek a direction to remove the encroachment on the public road at Market Road and Masuthi Street in Ward Nos.10 and 15, Thirukazhukundram Panchayat, Thirukazhukundram Taluk, Chengalpattu District.

¶13

A representation in reference to it was given by the petitioner and despite receipt of the representation, the encroachment has not been removed, causing traffic congestion on the roads. Photographs in this regard have also been produced by the petitioner.

¶14

In view of the above, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 26.03.2022 and take necessary action pursuant to it within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. If any encroachment is found, it goes without saying that it should be removed by due process of law. There will be no order as to costs.

¶15

Assistant Registrar(CS-IV)

¶16

// True Copy //

¶17

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶18

bbr

¶19

To:

¶20

1.The District Collector, Chengalpattu District, Chengalpattu.

¶21

2.The Revenue Divisional officer,

¶22

Thirukazhukundram, Chengalpattu District.

¶23

3.The Tahsildar, Thirukazhukundram, Chengalpattu District.

¶24

4.The Executive Officer, Town Panchayat, Thirukazhukundram, Chengalpattu District.

¶25

+2cc to Mr.K.Anbuselvan, Advocate SR.No.42175 +1cc to the Government Pleader SR.No.42892,42957

¶26

W.P.No.16451 of 2022

¶27

AK-II(CO) CB(11/07/2022)

K.Sarbudeen v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

K.Sarbudeen v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kotturpuram Youth Forum Vs Rajesh Lakhoni

N.Ramalingam Vs The Addl Secretary to

S.Harshanasabari Vs The Authorised officer

K R Ramaswamy Alias Traffic Ramasamy(Deceased) Vs Gnanadesigan

G.Selvarajan Vs M.S.Santhosh

Ayyaa Vs State of Tamil Nadu