Disposed

Kotturpuram Youth Forum v. Rajesh Lakhoni

Madras HC1 Jul 2022CONT P/1846/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Madras closed Contempt Petition No.1846 of 2013. Counsel submitted the petitioner was no longer represented after a change of vakalat. Finding no one represented the petitioner in a year-old matter, the court closed the proceedings without further adjudication.

What did the court decide?

Petition closed; proceedings against respondents on this specific charge are terminated without punishment.

Kotturpuram Youth Forum Vs Rajesh Lakhoni — Contempt of Court | Madras HC (2022)

¶1

Cont.P.No.1846 of 2013

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 01.07.2022

¶4

CORAM :

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR.MUNISHWAR NATH BHANDARI, CHIEF JUSTICE

¶6

AND

¶7

THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE N.MALA

¶8

Contempt Petition No.1846 of 2013

¶9

Kotturpuram Youth Forum (Youth wing of registered trust FICAS – Foundation for Innovative Casework and Research for education, economy and environment), Represented by its Secretary R.Ganesh Krish N-1, Adyar Apartments, Kotturpuram, Chennai-600 085.

¶10

.... Petitioner

¶11

¶12

1.Rajesh Lakhoni Commissioner, Corporation of Chennai, Rippon Buildings, 16, EVR Periyar Salai, Chennai-600003.

¶13

2.Devendranath Sarangi Secretary to Youth Affairs and Sports, Government of Tamil Nadu, Secretariat, Chennai-600009.

¶14

____________ Page 1 of 4_

¶15

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶16

Cont.P.No.1846 of 2013

¶17

3.Mr.K.R.Sivakumar,

¶18

Secretary,

¶19

Kottur Garden Residents' Association, Old No.23, New No.6, Cresent Road, Kottur Garden, Kotturpruam, Chennai-600085.

¶20

.. Respondents

¶21

Prayer: Petition filed Under Section 11 of Contempt of Courts Act to punish the respondents for wilful disobeying the order of contempt petition No.1149 of 2010 dated 07.07.2011.

¶22

For the Petitioner : No appearance

¶23

For the Respondents : Mrs.S.Vaitheeswari Stdg. Counsel for Corporation

¶24

¶25

ORDER

¶26

(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice)

¶27

Mr.V.Suresh, learned counsel for the petitioner on record,

¶28

submits that he has given change of vakalat and he is no more

¶29

appearing for the petitioner.

¶30

____________ Page 2 of 4_

¶31

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶32

Cont.P.No.1846 of 2013

¶33

In view of the above and as no one is representing the petitioner in a matter of the year 2013, the contempt petition is closed.

¶34

(M.N.B., CJ.) (N.M., J.) 01.07.2022 Index : Yes/No sra

¶35

____________ Page 3 of 4_

¶36

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶37

Cont.P.No.1846 of 2013

¶38

M.N.Bhandari, CJ. and N.Mala, J.

¶39

(sra)

¶40

Cont.P.No.1846 of 2013

¶41

01.07.2022

¶42

____________ Page 4 of 4_

¶43

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Kotturpuram Youth Forum v. Rajesh Lakhoni

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kotturpuram Youth Forum v. Rajesh Lakhoni

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mahendran Vs Saravanamuthu

P.Venkatachalam Vs Mr.Vijayakumar

M.G.Subramani Vs The District Collector

N.Ramalingam Vs The Addl Secretary to

S.Harshanasabari Vs The Authorised officer

Sabarinathan Vs The District Collector