In a writ petition under Article 226 challenging a letter regarding building lock and seal, the petitioner did not appear. The High Court of Madras dismissed the petition, connected writ miscellaneous petitions, and consequent orders for lack of prosecution by the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 01.07.2022
CORAM :
THE HON'BLE MR.MUNISHWAR NATH BHANDARI, CHIEF JUSTICE
AND
THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE N.MALA
W.P.No.6717 of 2018
N.Ramalingam .. Petitioner
vs
Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records pertains to the Impugned letter No.26105/UD-VI (1)/2016-10, dated 20.12.2017 and quash the same passed by the 1st respondent and consequently direct the respondent Nos.1 to 4 to remove the lock and seal and permit the petitioner to rectify the deviations and renovate the building as per the planning permission, sanctioned to the petitioner's property bearing New
Door No.32, Old Door No.110, East Vanniar Street, K.K.Nagar West, Chennai 600 078 and consequently permit the petitioner and his family members to reside in the said property.
For the Petitioner : No appearance
For the Respondents
: Mr.P.Muthukumar State Govt. Pleader for RR 1 and 5 : Mrs.S.Vaitheeswari Stdg. Counsel for RR2 to 4
ORDER
(Order of the Court was made by
the Hon'ble Chief Justice)
None appears on behalf of the petitioner. The writ petition is of the year 2018.
In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Consequently, W.M.P.Nos.8343 and 8344 of 2018 are also dismissed.
Assistant Registrar (CS-VII)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
sra
To:
W.P.No.6717 of 2018
KK (CO) PR (12/07/2022)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition seeking quashing of an impugned letter and removal of lock should be allowed.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
N.Ramalingam
Addl. Secretary to Government (Technical), Housing and Urban Development Department
Commissioner, Greater Chennai Corporation
Regional Deputy Commissioner (Central), Greater Chennai Corporation
Executive Engineer, Zone-X, Greater Chennai Corporation
Tahsildar, Mambalam Taluk
MUNISHWAR NATH BHANDARI
N.MALA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
