Disposed

Radhakrishnan v. The Thasildahar

Madras HC8 Jun 2022WP/14177/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought a writ of mandamus directing respondents to survey and measure his property and plant survey stones. The court directed the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation on merits and pass orders within twelve weeks without adjudicating merits.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondents to consider petitioners representation on merits and pass appropriate orders within twelve weeks.

Radhakrishnan Vs The Thasildahar — Land Acquisition | Madras HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 08.06.2022 CORAM

¶2

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI

W.P.No.14177 of 2022

Radhakrishnan

... Petitioner

Vs.

1.The Tahsildhar Cuddalore Taluk. 2.The Assistant Director, Survey and Land Records, Cuddalore. ... Respondents

¶8

Prayer:

¶9

Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to survey and measure the petitioner's property in Old Survey No.613/6 New S.No.439/7, East Ramapuram Village, Cuddalore Taluk and also plant survey stones therein in the petitioner's above property comprised in Natham patta No.436.

¶10

For Petitioner : Mr.N.Suresh For Respondents : Mr.R.P.Murugan Raja Additional Government Pleader

¶11

O R D E R

¶12

The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking issuance of Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to survey and measure the petitioner's property in Old Survey No.613/6 New S.No.439/7, East Ramapuram Village, Cuddalore Taluk and also plant survey stones therein in the petitioner's above property comprised in Natham patta No.436.

¶13

2.The case of the petitioner is that the petitioner is the owner of the subject properties and he made representation dated 27.04.2022 to the respondents seeking to survey and measure the properties and since the same has not yet been considered, has filed this writ petition.

¶14

3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that without going into the merits of the case, it would suffice, if this Court issues direction to the respondents to

¶15

consider the petitioner's representation dated 27.04.2022 and to pass appropriate orders within a reasonable time frame.

¶16

4.Considering the limited request made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this Court, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, directs the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 27.04.2022, on merits and in accordance with law and to pass appropriate orders, within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶17

5.This writ petition is accordingly disposed of. No costs.

¶18

Sd/-

¶19

Assistant Registrar(CS VIII)

¶20

//True Copy//

¶21

Sub Assistant Registrar

pri To

1.The Tahsildhar

Cuddalore Taluk.

2.The Assistant Director, Survey and Land Records, Cuddalore.

¶26

+1 cc to Mr.N.Suresh, Advocate Sr.NO. 33262

¶27

+1 cc to Government Pleader Sr.NO. 34234

¶28

W.P.No.14177 of 2022

¶29

ssn(CO) A.SK(17/06/2022)

Radhakrishnan v. The Thasildahar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Radhakrishnan v. The Thasildahar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

R.Siva Vs The District Registrar Office

S.Balraj Vs The District Revenue Officer

R.Selvadurai Vs District Revenue Officer

N.Ashok Kumar, Vs the Government of Tamil Nadu

V.S.Natarajhan Vs The State of Tamil Nadu

C.Karthikeyan (Deceased), Vs the District Collector