Disposed

R.Siva v. The District Registrar Office

Madras HC7 Jun 2022WP/11704/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court directed the 2nd respondent Registrar to entertain the petitioners' application for registration of an unregistered Sale Agreement dated 02.02.2022 within twelve weeks, subject to the papers being in order, arising from a refusal to register the document without valid reasons.

What did the court decide?

Directed the 2nd Respondent to entertain the Sale Agreement application within twelve weeks if papers are in order.

R.Siva Vs The District Registrar Office — Property and Title | Madras HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 07.06.2022

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI

¶5

W.P.No.11704 of 2022

¶6

and WMP.No.11166 of 2022

¶7

1.R.Siva

¶8

2.Jaya

¶9

3.Dhivyapriya ... Petitioners

¶10

Vs.

¶11

1.The District Registrar Office, Tirupur 641 602.

¶12

2.The Sub Registrar,

¶13

Office of the Sub Registrar, Uthukuli 638751.

¶14

... Respondents

¶15

PRAYER: This Writ Petition filed under Section 226 of Constitution of India, pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the 2nd respondent to register the unregistered Sale Agreement in Application No. SO1LANDVV202202028796813, dated 02.02.2022, to and in favour of the petitioners.

¶16

For Petitioners : Mr.R.Suresh

¶17

For Respondents : Mr.Yogesh Kanndasan Special Government Pleader

¶18

Order

¶19

This petition has been filed for issuance of writ of Mandamus to direct the 2nd respondent to register the unregistered Sale Agreement dated 02.02.2022 in favour of the petitioners.

¶20

The case of the petitioner is that they have purchased the properties situated at R.S.No.16/10 Ne.Pu.He 0.49.5 tha.Ru 1,37 Thiruvachi Village, Perunthurai, Erode District from the Power of Attorney namely one Tmt.Muthulakshmi and the said Muthulakshmi has also executed a Sale Deed in favour of the 1^st petitioner and his partner viz., Boopalan, dated 11.03.2021. Since the petitioner wanted to transfer the absolute title in favour of the 2^nd petitioner, he https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ requested the 2^nd respondent to register the unregistered Sale

¶21

Deed. However, the 2^nd respondent without any valid reasons, had refused to register the same. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner is before this Court.

¶22

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner

¶23

submitted that it would suffice if this Court issues direction to the respondent to register the unregistered Sale Agreement dated 02.02.2022 in favour of the petitioners.

¶24

4.The learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the official respondents submitted that if the papers are otherwise in order, the respondents will entertain the Sale Agreement dated 02.02.2022 within a reasonable time as fixed by this Court.

¶25

In view of the aforesaid submissions, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case directs the respondents to entertain the petitioner's Sale Agreement dated 02.02.2022, if the papers are otherwise in order, within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. This writ petition is accordingly disposed of. No costs. Consequently connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶26

Sd/-

¶27

Assistant Registrar (CO)

¶28

//True Copy//

¶29

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶30

¶31

¶32

1.The District Registrar Office, Tirupur 641 602.

¶33

2.The Sub Registrar, Office of the Sub Registrar, Uthukuli 638751.

¶34

+1cc to Mr.R.Suresh, Advocate SR. No. 32817

¶35

+1cc to Government Pleader SR. No. 33717

¶36

W.P.No.11704 of 2022

¶37

GPL (CO) PR (20/06/2022)

¶38

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

R.Siva v. The District Registrar Office

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

R.Siva v. The District Registrar Office

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

S.Vijayakumar, Vs the Special Commissioner and

Mr. Sudheshwaran Vs The District Collector

M/s.Super Goods Films Pvt. Ltd. Vs The Commissioner

S.Balraj Vs The District Revenue Officer

R.Selvadurai Vs District Revenue Officer

Parasmal Vs The Revenue Divisional Officer