BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH…
Withdrawal and transfer of HMOP.No.50 of 2020 from Thanjavur to Trichy was dismissed for default due to absence of petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
TR.C.M.P(MD)No.118 of 2022
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 27.07.2022
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI
TR.C.M.P(MD)No.118 of 2022 and C.M.P(MD)No.2402 of 2022
M.Kumar ... Petitioner Vs Kannaki ... Respondent
Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition is filed under Section 24 of C.P.C, to withdraw HMOP.No.50 of 2020 pending on the file of the Family Court, Thanjavur and transfer the same to the Family Court, Trichy.
For Petitioner : Mr.J.Prabhu
For Respondent : Mr.N.Tamilmani
ORDER
When this petition was taken up for hearing on
20.07.2022 there was no representation for the
petitioner. Hence it was directed to be listed today under the caption 'for dismissal'.
1/3
TR.C.M.P(MD)No.118 of 2022
2.Accordingly the petition is listed under the caption 'for dismissal' today. Despite the same, there is no representation for the petitioner even today. Therefore, this civil miscellaneous petition stands dismissed for default. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition also stands dismissed.
27.07.2022
dsk
Index : Yes / No Internet: Yes / No To
The Judge, Family Court, Thanjavur.
2/3
TR.C.M.P(MD)No.118 of 2022
B.PUGALENDHI, J.
dsk
TR.C.M.P(MD)No.118 of 2022
27.07.2022
3/3
M.Kumar
Kannaki
B.Pugalandhi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
